1983
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90210-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autophotography in evaluation of functional penile disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, objective measures are limited to autophotography performed by the patient before and after treatment. 57 These studies showed mean improvement in deformity of 10-311 in 28-53.7% of men treated. Mean curvature improvement by degree was not reported in most of the published studies, but was noted to be 10-311 in two studies.…”
Section: External Energy Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, objective measures are limited to autophotography performed by the patient before and after treatment. 57 These studies showed mean improvement in deformity of 10-311 in 28-53.7% of men treated. Mean curvature improvement by degree was not reported in most of the published studies, but was noted to be 10-311 in two studies.…”
Section: External Energy Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curvature (degree of angulation) was documented by means of photography using the Kelâmi technique during an intracavernous pharmacon injection test 10 mg Prostaglandin E 1 (Caverject 2 ). 13 The follow-up consisted of a standardized telephone and=or personal interview to inquire about penile straightening. If recurrent curvature was reported, the patient was invited for presentation in our outpatient department for exact evaluation and documentation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second injection was planned to be administered if necessary to achieve full erectile response, but this was never necessary since all patients were able to achieve full rigidity with the first ICI. The penile deviations were assessed on the basis of photo archives gathered in the outpatient clinic using the Kelami method [7] and calculated using a paper protractor. [8] The following parameters were assessed before intervention: Pain on erection using a visual pain scale of 1-10, [9] satisfaction with vaginal penetration according to the international index of erectile dysfunction (IIEF)15 scale score, [10] penile deviation (in degrees), [7] and plaque size (cm 2 ) as assessed using ultrasonography + ICI PGE1, 20 µg.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%