2006
DOI: 10.1080/01490450500399946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic Comparisons of Radionuclide Adsorption Between Subsurface Anaerobic Biofilms and Granitic Host Rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of viruses on microbial processes has been identified as an important factor to include in model studies. In particular, they seem to have an important mitigation effect on sulphide production by SRB (Eydal, 2009;Kyle, 2008a;Pedersen, 2013) Microbial biofilms was found to significantly influence the sorption of radionuclides on glass and rock surfaces (Anderson, et al, 2006a(Anderson, et al, , 2007. In addition, it has been demonstrated that microbial iron oxidising biofilms are strong sorbents for trace elements (Anderson, et al, 2006b;Anderson and Pedersen, 2003).…”
Section: High-level Waste Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of viruses on microbial processes has been identified as an important factor to include in model studies. In particular, they seem to have an important mitigation effect on sulphide production by SRB (Eydal, 2009;Kyle, 2008a;Pedersen, 2013) Microbial biofilms was found to significantly influence the sorption of radionuclides on glass and rock surfaces (Anderson, et al, 2006a(Anderson, et al, , 2007. In addition, it has been demonstrated that microbial iron oxidising biofilms are strong sorbents for trace elements (Anderson, et al, 2006b;Anderson and Pedersen, 2003).…”
Section: High-level Waste Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies at the Äspö URL examined radionuclide sorption processes which compared the adsorption capacity of granitic rock to biofilms grown in situ on glass and rock surfaces (Anderson et al 2006). After immersing the surfaces for 42 days in anaerobic synthetic groundwater containing a number of radioactive tracers the adsorption and distribution of the radionuclides was investigated using 2D autoradiography.…”
Section: Microbial Transport Studies Associated With the äSpö Hard Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, the amount of smectite formed was greater in the biotic CSTR experiments demonstrating that the bacteria were having a significant influence on clay mineral formation in the experiments. More details of these studies are described elsewhere Hama et al 2001).Other studies at the Äspö URL examined radionuclide sorption processes which compared the adsorption capacity of granitic rock to biofilms grown in situ on glass and rock surfaces (Anderson et al 2006). After immersing the surfaces for 42 days in anaerobic synthetic groundwater containing a number of radioactive tracers the adsorption and distribution of the radionuclides was investigated using 2D autoradiography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms are known to provide a sink for dissolved heavy metals (Späth et al, 1998) because the EPS, cell walls, cell membranes, and cell cytoplasm can serve as sorption sites (Flemming, 1995). Anderson et al (2006Anderson et al ( , 2007 recently examined the adsorption capacity of subsurface anaerobic biofilms from the Ä spö Hard Rock Laboratory tunnel in Sweden using 60 Co(II), 147 Pm(III), 241 Am(III), 234 Th(IV), 237 Np(V), and 99 Mo(VI) as radioactive tracers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%