1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(98)00629-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic film evaluated with desktop scanner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic range of the scanner can be improved by tuning brightness and contrast as described in a reference article [16]. Also the reliability of the radiometric calibration can be improved by calibrating the grey scale wedge and by using the calibrated density values instead of the nominal values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic range of the scanner can be improved by tuning brightness and contrast as described in a reference article [16]. Also the reliability of the radiometric calibration can be improved by calibrating the grey scale wedge and by using the calibrated density values instead of the nominal values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a microscope the source structure, crystal size and irregularities can be visualized (figure 4(a)). The activity distribution, and thus the homogeneity, can be displayed by making autoradiographs of the source using photographic film, a phosphor screen or a solid track detector (figure 4(b)) [28][29][30][31]. A measure of the self-absorption of the source is given by the variation of the β-efficiency [32] or the peak-shape parameters of an alpha-particle peak [33].…”
Section: Methods To Check and Improve Source Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity distribution of the fallout-contami nated EZ topsoil is normal; with a mean 137Cs specific activity of 107 kBq kg-1 and a standard deviation of 2 %, which is greatly in excess of the statistical counting error 0.4%. A Monte Carlo simulation (Nageldinger et a/., 1998a) for this source-detector geometry has shown that the generated sample activity distributions are normal if the number of hot particles is larger than a certain limit, and assuming the same activity for every hot particle. This limit, in our case, was at ~50 hot particles (Nageldinger et a/., 1998b).…”
Section: Hot-partide Number Activity and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital processing of the exposed film is used to convert the image into a two-dimensional array of greyscale pixels. It is then possible to characterize each pixel with a standardized numerical value of reflection density according to a standard Kodak 20 point grey scale (values 0.0 to 1.9) (Nageldinger et al, 1998a). These reflection densities can then be compared between films.…”
Section: Chernobyl Fallout Hot-particle Characterization Using Differmentioning
confidence: 99%