1985
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(85)90772-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic localization of atriopeptin III receptors in rat kidney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub sequently, we demonstrated by in vitro autoradiography that the specific binding sites for a-rAN P (28 amino acid residues) were localized on the glomeruli, renal artery, renal pelvis, and inner medullary tissues including the collecting tubule (2). More recently, some of our initial observations were confirmed in brief reports of other in vestigators using the similar technique (3,4).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Sub sequently, we demonstrated by in vitro autoradiography that the specific binding sites for a-rAN P (28 amino acid residues) were localized on the glomeruli, renal artery, renal pelvis, and inner medullary tissues including the collecting tubule (2). More recently, some of our initial observations were confirmed in brief reports of other in vestigators using the similar technique (3,4).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our laboratory was one of the first to identify ANF receptors on renal membranes, but we did not localize these receptors to a specific site in the kidney. 15 Later, there was abundant evidence of localization of ANF receptors on the glomeruli 16 but binding to renal tubules was scant. Quite recently several papers have appeared documenting a renal tubular receptor that is linked through guanylate cyclase and mediates sodium transport.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have indicated that ANP receptors from a variety of tissues possess different affinities for the circulating form of the hormone [ANP(99-126)] and its analogs (Hirata et al, 1984;Ballermann et al, 1985;De Lean et al, 1985;Hirose et al, 1985;Misono et al, 1985;Murphy et al, 1985;Schenk et al, 1987). It has also been shown that in several tissues the Kd for ANP, as measured in binding assays, can differ from the EC,, for guanylate cyclase stimulation by as much as loo-fold (Hirata et al, 1984;Leitman and Murad, 1986;Neuser and Bellemann, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%