1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199801)28:1<44::aid-syn6>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic localization of neurotransmitter binding sites in the hypoglossal and motor trigeminal nuclei of the rat

Abstract: The hypoglossal and motor trigeminal nuclei contain somatic motoneurons innervating the tongue, jaw, and palate. These two cranial motor nuclei are myotopically organized and contain neurotransmitter binding sites for thyrotropin-releasing hormone, substance P, and serotonin. Quantitative autoradiography was used to localize thyrotropin-releasing hormone, substance P, and serotonin-1A and serotonin-1B binding sites in the hypoglossal and motor trigeminal nuclei and to relate the relative distributions of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SP interacts with NK1 receptors, NKA with NK2 receptors and NKB with NK3 receptors (Rekling et al 2000). Our focus on NK1 receptors was based on extensive anatomical and electrophysiological evidence that: (i) of the three neurokinin receptors, NK1 receptors are predominantly expressed in spinal motoneurons (Dam et al 1990a(Dam et al ,b, 1993Yashpal et al 1990;Beresford et al 1992;Nakaya et al 1994;Ding et al 1996;Manaker & Zucchi, 1998); (ii) that the postsynaptic actions of SP are mimicked by NK1 agonists (Fisher et al 1994;Lepre et al 1996);and (iii) that the minor effects of NKA and NKB receptor stimulation are largely blocked by TTX, suggesting a presynaptic location (Matsuto et al 1984;Fisher et al 1994;Ptak et al 2000). Antagonism of NK1 receptors has variable effects on SP or NK1 agonistinduced depolarization in neonatal tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…SP interacts with NK1 receptors, NKA with NK2 receptors and NKB with NK3 receptors (Rekling et al 2000). Our focus on NK1 receptors was based on extensive anatomical and electrophysiological evidence that: (i) of the three neurokinin receptors, NK1 receptors are predominantly expressed in spinal motoneurons (Dam et al 1990a(Dam et al ,b, 1993Yashpal et al 1990;Beresford et al 1992;Nakaya et al 1994;Ding et al 1996;Manaker & Zucchi, 1998); (ii) that the postsynaptic actions of SP are mimicked by NK1 agonists (Fisher et al 1994;Lepre et al 1996);and (iii) that the minor effects of NKA and NKB receptor stimulation are largely blocked by TTX, suggesting a presynaptic location (Matsuto et al 1984;Fisher et al 1994;Ptak et al 2000). Antagonism of NK1 receptors has variable effects on SP or NK1 agonistinduced depolarization in neonatal tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Recent data on phrenic MNs suggest that the effects of SP differ between endogenous inspiratory inputs and somally injected inputs (Ptak et al 2000). In addition, the high expression of NK1 receptors in spinal (particularly phrenic) MN pools relative to moderate or low expression in XII, facial and trigeminal motoneuron pools (Charlton & Helke, 1985;Yashpal et al 1990;Nakaya et al 1994;Manaker & Zucchi, 1998) suggests that actions may differ between motoneuron pools. Given the hypothesis that a mismatch of activity in upper airway and inspiratory pump muscles contributes to apnoea (Hudgel & Harasick, 1990), there is considerable interest in understanding the basis of this differential excitability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The expression of NK 1 receptors is not uniform among motoneuronal pools, however, implying that effects of substance P may vary depending on the particular motoneuronal pool. For example, some motoneuronal populations express very high levels, e.g., phrenic, pudendal motoneurons, whereas others express moderate, e.g., hypoglossal motoneurons, or only very low levels of NK 1 receptor, e.g., facial, trigeminal motoneurons (210,791,892,1405). The NK 2 receptor is preferentially located in the periphery with only low levels of binding sites in the CNS, whereas the NK 3 receptor has a widespread CNS distribution; neither NK 2 or NK 3 receptors, however, are prominent in motor nuclei (272,293,1149,1405).…”
Section: Functional Role Of Trh In Modulating Motoneuronal Excitabilimentioning
confidence: 99%