1976
DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic study of protein and RNA formation during early development of Drosophila eggs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This cross is sterile, producing two classes of aneuploid progeny with respect to chromosome two: C(2)EN/2 individuals and 2/0 individuals. Because there is little gene expression during the initial embryonic divisions (McKnight and Miller, 1976;Zalokar, 1976;Anderson and Lengyel, 1981;Edgar and Schubiger, 1986;Merrill et al, 1988;Wieschaus and Sweeton, 1988), these aneuploid individuals can develop relatively normally through the syncytial divisions. We could distinguish between these two classes during the syncytial divisions because 2/0 embryos and C(2)EN/2 embryos possess one and three copies of the Kruppel gene, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cross is sterile, producing two classes of aneuploid progeny with respect to chromosome two: C(2)EN/2 individuals and 2/0 individuals. Because there is little gene expression during the initial embryonic divisions (McKnight and Miller, 1976;Zalokar, 1976;Anderson and Lengyel, 1981;Edgar and Schubiger, 1986;Merrill et al, 1988;Wieschaus and Sweeton, 1988), these aneuploid individuals can develop relatively normally through the syncytial divisions. We could distinguish between these two classes during the syncytial divisions because 2/0 embryos and C(2)EN/2 embryos possess one and three copies of the Kruppel gene, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, reducing the function of mdf-2 and a Mad3-like gene called san-1 decreased the observed frequency of metaphase stage cells after microtubule destabilization, suggesting that a spindle checkpoint functions in the early embryo (Nystul et al, 2003). Studies in Drosophila have shown that microtubule inhibitors arrest early embryos with metaphase-like chromatin (Zalokar 1976;Foe and Alberts, 1983), and abnormally compacted chromosomes delay anaphase and result in nuclear "fallout" (Sullivan et al, 1993). However, the failure of microtubule depolymerizing drugs such as nocodazole to arrest mitosis in early embryonic cells has led to suggestions that the rapid mitotic divisions that occur in some early embryos do not use a spindle checkpoint (Murray and Hunt, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeling of somatic nuclei and not the germline nuclei with the mRNA precursor [H3]-uridine in Drosophila early embryos provided the first clue that germline specification might require transcriptional repression. 25 Later, studies in C. elegans also concluded the same by using in situ hybridization to detect zygotic mRNAs in somatic, but not germline, blastomeres. 26,27 Transcriptional quiescence in PGCs is achieved by direct inhibition of RNA polymerase II transcriptional initiation and elongation functions in early embryos by PIE-1 and Pgc in C. elegans and Drosophila, respectively.…”
Section: Transcriptional Repression In Germ Cell Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 97%