The prophage state of bacteriophage λ is extremely stable and is maintained by a highly regulated level of λ repressor protein, CI, which represses lytic functions. CI regulates its own synthesis in a lysogen by activating and repressing its promoter, P RM . CI participates in long-range interactions involving two regions of widely separated operator sites by generating a loop in the intervening DNA. We investigated the roles of each individual site under conditions that permitted DNA loop formation by using in vitro transcription assays for the first time on supercoiled DNA that mimics in vivo situation. We confirmed that DNA loops generated by oligomerization of CI bound to its operators influence the autoactivation and autorepression of P RM regulation. We additionally report that different configurations of DNA loops are central to this regulation-one configuration further enhances autoactivation and another is essential for autorepression of P RM .activation | cooperativity | repression B acteriophage lambda (λ) of Escherichia coli can grow either in a lytic or lysogenic mode. In a lysogenic cell, the phageencoded λ repressor protein (CI) prevents lytic growth by directly repressing two promoters needed to express lytic functions, P L and P R (1-3). Each promoter is associated with a CI recognition site or operator,. O R is associated with promoter P RM (promoter for maintenance of repressor synthesis), which directs transcription of the cI gene in the prophage state (4-6). Each subsite binds a CI dimer (7).The CI protein autoregulates its synthesis. At low cellular CI concentration, CI enhances its own synthesis from P RM ; when high, CI represses P RM (1,8,9). It was originally believed that both positive and negative autoregulations are achieved exclusively by the action of CI dimers at the P RM -O R -P R sequence of the phage genome (1, 10) (Fig. 1A), based on the following observations. (i) There is a hierarchy of intrinsic binding affinities of a CI dimer to individual operators sites: (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17); (ii) CI bound to the intrinsically weak O R 2 site is strengthened by cooperative interactions with CI bound to the stronger adjacent O R 1 site, and the ensemble of two CI dimers at the O R 1 ∼ O R 2 sites represses P R and activates P RM (13, 16) (Fig. 1A); (iii) at high CI concentrations, a CI dimer can bind to the weakest operator site, O R 3, repressing P RM (1, 2) (Fig. 1C). Incidentally, a second pair of CI dimers binds cooperatively to O L 1 ∼ O L 2, and represses P L (7).This model was recently modified on the basis of physical and genetic experiments showing that a CI tetramer cooperatively bound to O R 1 ∼ O R 2 interacts with a tetramer cooperatively bound to O L 1 ∼ O L 2, located 2.3 kbp away (18-21), resulting in the looping out of the intervening DNA, as shown by electron and atomic force microscopy (18,22,23). DNA loop was also observed by cooperative interactions of CI at sites separated by only five and six helical turns (23, 24). The kinetic and thermodynamic properties ...