1998
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoregulation of the Raf-1 serine/threonine kinase

Abstract: The Raf-1 serine͞threonine kinase is a key protein involved in the transmission of many growth and developmental signals. In this report, we show that autoinhibition mediated by the noncatalytic, N-terminal regulatory region of Raf-1 is an important mechanism regulating Raf-1 function. The inhibition of the regulatory region occurs, at least in part, through binding interactions involving the cysteine-rich domain. Events that disrupt this autoinhibition, such as mutation of the cysteine-rich domain or a mutati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
143
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that the S365A mutation increases not only the biological activity of B-Raf wt but also rescues that of B-Raf with a neutralized N-region (Figure 3b and c) strongly supports a model in which a major function of the N-region is to oppose the transition into an inactive conformation stabilized by binding of a 14-3-3 dimer to S365 and S729. Our model (Figure 9a), similar to that suggested by Mercer and Pritchard (2003), is consistent with recent studies showing that the negatively charged N-region of Raf-1 relieves autoinhibition by the N-terminal moiety owing to its reduced affinity towards a CR3 with a charged N-region (Cutler et al, 1998;Tran and Frost, 2003). However, we accept that similar experiments led to the alternative conclusion that the charged N-region induces a conformational change that does not affect the interaction between N-and C-terminal moiety but renders the CR3 resistant to the autoinhibition imposed by the N-terminal moiety (Chong and Guan, 2003).…”
Section: Regulation Of B-raf Signallingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our finding that the S365A mutation increases not only the biological activity of B-Raf wt but also rescues that of B-Raf with a neutralized N-region (Figure 3b and c) strongly supports a model in which a major function of the N-region is to oppose the transition into an inactive conformation stabilized by binding of a 14-3-3 dimer to S365 and S729. Our model (Figure 9a), similar to that suggested by Mercer and Pritchard (2003), is consistent with recent studies showing that the negatively charged N-region of Raf-1 relieves autoinhibition by the N-terminal moiety owing to its reduced affinity towards a CR3 with a charged N-region (Cutler et al, 1998;Tran and Frost, 2003). However, we accept that similar experiments led to the alternative conclusion that the charged N-region induces a conformational change that does not affect the interaction between N-and C-terminal moiety but renders the CR3 resistant to the autoinhibition imposed by the N-terminal moiety (Chong and Guan, 2003).…”
Section: Regulation Of B-raf Signallingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…D279 and its context do not fit the proposed consensus motif for a caspase-9 cleavage site (Thornberry et al, 1997;Garcia-Calvo et al, 1999), but the autocatalytic cleavage site (PEPDA) in caspase-9 itself also exhibits poor similarity with the consensus sequence (Stennicke et al, 1999). Previous work has shown that Raf-1 contains an autoinhibitory domain within the first 330 amino acids of its N-terminus (Cutler et al, 1998;. Deletions of the N-terminal regulatory domain have been found in several activated forms of Raf genes detected in certain neoplastic human cells (Stanton and Cooper, 1987), resulting in a constitutively active kinase domain that is comparable to the oncogenic v-Raf protein (Cleveland et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Ras dimer would elegantly resolve the steric dilemma of how the tiny Ras effector domain can engage two different domains in Raf at the same time. In any case, Ras binding seems to relieve the inhibition which the N-terminal regulatory domain of Raf-1 exerts over the catalytic domain at the C-terminus [34]. Point mutations in the CRD, which can alleviate this inhibition, were isolated in a screen for Raf-1 mutations that increased the affinity for Ras [25].…”
Section: A Complicated Relationship : How Ras Proteins Regulate Raf Kmentioning
confidence: 99%