2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autosomal and X chromosome Alu insertions in Bolivian Aymaras and Quechuas: Two languages and one genetic pool

Abstract: Thirty-two polymorphic Alu insertions (18 autosomal and 14 from the X chromosome) were studied in 192 individuals from two Amerindian populations of the Bolivian Altiplano (Aymara and Quechua speakers: the two main Andean linguistic groups), to provide relevant information about their genetic relationships and demographic processes. The main objective was to determine from genetic data whether the expansion of the Quechua language into Bolivia could be associated with demographic (Inca migration of Quechua-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eastern samples presented larger within‐group genetic distances and lower intrapopulation diversity parameters than for the Andean samples for both sets of markers. This is consistent with different patterns of drift and gene flow related to larger effective population sizes in the Andean area, as suggested by different kinds of data (mtDNA, Fuselli et al,2003; Y‐chromosome, Tarazona‐Santos et al,2001; classical markers, Luiselli et al,2000; STRs, Wang et al,2007, and PAIs, Gayà‐Vidal et al,2010). High diversities have also been reported in the Andean surrounding areas of Chaco and the Bolivian lowlands that may suggest a certain influence from the Andean region (also reflected in the MDS plots), mainly for the mtDNA data, because no genetic structuring was found according to hierarchical AMOVA analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eastern samples presented larger within‐group genetic distances and lower intrapopulation diversity parameters than for the Andean samples for both sets of markers. This is consistent with different patterns of drift and gene flow related to larger effective population sizes in the Andean area, as suggested by different kinds of data (mtDNA, Fuselli et al,2003; Y‐chromosome, Tarazona‐Santos et al,2001; classical markers, Luiselli et al,2000; STRs, Wang et al,2007, and PAIs, Gayà‐Vidal et al,2010). High diversities have also been reported in the Andean surrounding areas of Chaco and the Bolivian lowlands that may suggest a certain influence from the Andean region (also reflected in the MDS plots), mainly for the mtDNA data, because no genetic structuring was found according to hierarchical AMOVA analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a previous study (Gayà‐Vidal et al,2010), the two Bolivian samples presented, according to 32 PAIs, a genetic similarity and a separation from the two Peruvian Quechua‐speaker samples (Tayacaja and Arequipa) from the literature. This suggested a common origin of the two Bolivian populations and an expansion of the Quechua language mainly due to cultural rather than demographic processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the impact of the gene flow in the gene pool of the different Jujuy subpopulations, admixture proportions were estimated through the Weighted Least Squares method (Long et al,1991). To that end, allele frequency data on American, European and African populations were compiled from previously published works (Gómez‐Pérez et al,2010; Gayà‐Vidal et al,2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el caso de las Secuencias Alu se incluyeron datos de las poblaciones de África y Europa, tipificadas en la Universidad de Barcelona (UB), cortesía de la Dra. María Esther Esteban [78,79]. 38 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,45 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,18 0,19 0,19 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 41 0,29 0,44 0,38 1,00 0,33 0,30 0,39 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,47 0,47 1,00 1,00 0,25 0,31 0,37 0,29 1,00 0,00 1,00 1,00 * ---+ ----42 0,44 1,00 1,00 0,38 1,00 0,45 1,00 0,23 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,00 0,00 1,00 1,00 0,33 0,00 1,00 0,42 1,00 0,47 0,47 1,00 1,00 * -------43 0,25 0,44 0,47 0,75 0,41 1,00 0,74 0,58 0,49 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,17 0,11 1,00 0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,00 0,47 1,00 0,30 0,45 0,33 0,08 * --+ ---44 0,37 0,00 1,00 1,00 0,49 0,15 0,76 1,00 0,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,44 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,49 1,00 1,00 0,48 1,00 0,47 1,00 1,00 0,30 * -----45 0,55 1,00 1,00 0,84 0,42 0,75 0,28 0,56 0,63 0,35 1,00 0,46 0,35 0,48 0,00 1,00 0,28 0,70 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,74 0,74 0,85 0,00 1,00 0,86 0,49 * --+ -46 0,24 0,24 1,00 0,44 0,44 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,30 0,34 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,00 0,21 0,13 0,22 0,40 0,40 0,40 1,00 0,23 0,00 1,00 0,48 * ---47 0,76 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,46 0,39 0,04 1,00 0,57 0,70 0,55 1,00 0,02 1,00 1,00 0,19 1,00 1,00 0,49 0,56 0,27 0,00 1,00 1,00 0,51 0,47 0,48 1,00 * --48 0,16 1,00 0,48 0,03 0,22 0,63 0,50 1,00 0,19 0,24 1,00 0,07 0,63 0,52 0,57 1,00 0,21 0,19 0,54 0,46 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,21 1,00 0,47 1,00 0,47 0,02 1,00 1,00 * -49 0,78 0,71 0,35 0,08 0,67 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,28 0,66 0,73 0,80 0,30 0,29 1,00 0,10 0,12 0,88 0,84 1,00 0,85 0,25 0,25 0,46 0,71 0,79 0,18 0,27 0,68 1,00 0,84 0,32 * # 0 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 0 * -----------2 1,00 * ----------3 0,47 0,66 * -+ -------5 0,58 0,61 0,27 *…”
Section: Análisis De Estructura Genética Mediante La Comparación Con unclassified