1965
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90242-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autosomal dominant hemolytic anemia characterized by ovalocytosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present cases should be differentiated from 'idiopathic haemolytic ovalocytosis' described by Cutting et al (1965), and from 'hereditary haemolytic anaemia with "elllipocytosis"' described by Baker et al (1961). These cases also showed moderate degree of RBC eccentricity but differences are apparent in respect of relative marrow failure and incomplete response to splenectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present cases should be differentiated from 'idiopathic haemolytic ovalocytosis' described by Cutting et al (1965), and from 'hereditary haemolytic anaemia with "elllipocytosis"' described by Baker et al (1961). These cases also showed moderate degree of RBC eccentricity but differences are apparent in respect of relative marrow failure and incomplete response to splenectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…These cases also showed moderate degree of RBC eccentricity but differences are apparent in respect of relative marrow failure and incomplete response to splenectomy. Differences in the osmotic fragility and autohaemolysis further differentiate the present cases from those of Cutting et al (1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…that the family probably belonged to the genealogi cal type where the defective gene is coupled to the rhesus locus [2], Comment An exact grouping of our subjects with HO according to de Gruchy et al [5] is not possible since splenectomy had been per formed on 2 of them. They probably belong to group 1, although group 2 cannot be ex cluded since the father's autohaemolysis test was slightly increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%