2019
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autostimulation in Vagus Nerve Stimulator Treatment: Modulating Neuromodulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-world use of the AutoStim Mode has been shown to increase VNS Therapy therapeutic efficacy in both pediatric and adult patients across varying epilepsy etiologies (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55). Additionally, patients who elect to switch from a conventional VNS Therapy generator to a closedloop AutoStim generator (e.g., M106, M1000, M1000-D) can experience additional therapeutic improvement upon generator replacement (50,52,56,57) (Table 2; Figure 1).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Vns Therapy Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-world use of the AutoStim Mode has been shown to increase VNS Therapy therapeutic efficacy in both pediatric and adult patients across varying epilepsy etiologies (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55). Additionally, patients who elect to switch from a conventional VNS Therapy generator to a closedloop AutoStim generator (e.g., M106, M1000, M1000-D) can experience additional therapeutic improvement upon generator replacement (50,52,56,57) (Table 2; Figure 1).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Vns Therapy Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study group was 30 patients of which 13 received traditional VNS therapy before implanting the VNS model 106 AspireSR (LivaNova, Houston, TX, USA) allowing for automatic stimulation. All these patients were presented in our previous paper (15). One patient from the previous study was excluded because the follow‐up was transferred to another hospital.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and function of rVNS therapy is lacking. We recently published a study assessing a group of 14 patients receiving rVNS therapy, with prior traditional VNS (models 102 and 103) therapy; in which we described the initiation of rVNS leading to better control of seizures and a decrease in AED burden (15). On the other hand, there is little data about the effect of different VNS settings on the number of stimulations and energy consumption, and there are no practical guidelines for the programming of the rVNS device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37) Another study also revealed that VNS with AutoStim Mode achieved maintenance of prior-established seizure control with markedly less energy consumption and improved seizure control as compared to the previous models. 38) Patients who did not respond to the previous models only with the open-loop system may obtain seizure reduction by replacement to the Model 106 even though output currents and duty cycles were reduced. 39) However, these additional benefits and the reasons why VNS with autostimulation responding ictal tachycardia works well with less energy consumption, less output current, or less duty cycle are still unclarified.…”
Section: Implantable Devices For Medically Refractory Epilepsymentioning
confidence: 99%