2015
DOI: 10.1642/auk-13-260.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autumn morning flights of migrant songbirds in the northeastern United States are linked to nocturnal migration and winds aloft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of the behavior of birds that engage in migratory flights after sunrise (i.e., morning flight) highlighted a pattern in which migrants engaged in these flights after larger nocturnal movements and after the presence of stronger nocturnal crosswinds (Van Doren et al. , Horton et al. , Van Doren et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies of the behavior of birds that engage in migratory flights after sunrise (i.e., morning flight) highlighted a pattern in which migrants engaged in these flights after larger nocturnal movements and after the presence of stronger nocturnal crosswinds (Van Doren et al. , Horton et al. , Van Doren et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, birds may fly under the beam as they pass Boston (a 37.5 km radius from the Boston, Massachusetts, station barely reaches the Rhode Island coast and its stopover sites, with the beam height approximately 115–735 m above the ground) and move into more favorable habitat during the course of stopover periods (e.g., in morning flight, Van Doren et al. , 2016; concentrations of birds in higher quality stopover habitat during the day, Faaborg et al. , Wolfe et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting to notice that both Raven's and XBAT's false detections were sounds generated by abiotic factors (wind and rain), self-noise and insect activity. Similar types of sounds were false positives in other studies using these tools (Swiston and Mennill 2009;Brown et al 2013;Van Doren et al 2015 XBAT's detector was the fastest method and had good comprehensiveness, making it very useful in studies where finding all target sounds is not mandatory and time is a constraint. For instance, if a conservation study wants to determine whether a species is present in an area, this fast sound data analysis method would be more effective than other methods.…”
Section: Detection Comprehensiveness and False Positivesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Raven misclassified as target sounds those generated by wind, insects and microphone static (Figure 6), and the number of false positives was almost twice as high as the number of hits (true positives). Recent studies using Raven's Band Limited Energy Detector to find sounds of fin whales (Morano et al 2012) and migrant songbirds (Van Doren et al 2015) show high true positive percentages: 79% comprehensiveness for whales and 96% in low noise conditions for birds, although also capturing a large number of false positives in the bird study (more than 90% of detections). Raven's detector also showed high accuracy in detection of motor vehicle noise in a forested landscape (Brown et al 2013).…”
Section: Detection Comprehensiveness and False Positivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nocturnal migrants make additional movements during the morning hours in a phenomenon called “morning flight” (Baird and Nisbet , Gauthreaux , Bingman , Yaukey , Van Doren et al. , ). Morning flights are most commonly observed near coastal areas, where they are usually directed either toward the coast when migrants are over water or inland away from the coast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%