2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2018.0-101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AUX and UX Evaluation of User Tools in Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper gives continuity and expands the research that we have previously published on this topic [36,37]. The objective of the present work was to know whether there are and which are the differences between User eXpectations (AUX) and the experiences they find on social networks (EUX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This paper gives continuity and expands the research that we have previously published on this topic [36,37]. The objective of the present work was to know whether there are and which are the differences between User eXpectations (AUX) and the experiences they find on social networks (EUX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Other literature sources also concentrate on searching for and evaluating UX output heuristics. Authors in [15] state that "… in this article, we propose a novel AUX (Anticipated User eXperience) and UX evaluation method through which developers can obtain a knowledge base to create their designs… Intended Use: This criterion refers to the usage purpose of each user tool. For example, the way the user believes that a chat should work… Positive Anticipated Emotion: It concerns pleasant emotions that a user anticipates experiencing as a consequence of interacting with a user tool... ".…”
Section: Target Data Definition Based On Ux/cx Evaluation Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two studies [8,36] use sensors, such as eye trackers, to identify the area that the user is observing. Almost half of the studies [1,2,8,32,33,[41][42][43][44][45][46] use some form of questionnaire to obtain qualitative information about user experience or usability. The vast majority of studies perform in loco evaluation, with the specialist observing the test in the same location as the participant, except for References [8,30,36], where the specialist remotely observe user interaction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%