2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0572-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxiliary diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer using quantitative evaluation of sentinel node radioactivity

Abstract: Background Sentinel node (SN) mapping using dye and radioisotope (RI) tracer has been reported to be feasible in cases of early gastric cancer. Because accurate diagnosis of micrometastasis is sometimes difficult in the limited time available during surgery, a faster and simpler method of improving the intraoperative diagnostic precision of lymph node metastasis is needed. The amount of tracer deposited in an SN can be determined from its radioactivity; however, the significance of the RI count has not been fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous study demonstrated that the number of identified SNs in metastatic cases was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic cases. We believe that the development of the lymphatic network and a large lymphatic flow rate may affect the number of identified SNs and may be associated with metastasis in non-SN basins [38]. Although no significant difference with respect to OS were observed, CSS was significantly low in patients with LN metastasis in non-SN basins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Our previous study demonstrated that the number of identified SNs in metastatic cases was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic cases. We believe that the development of the lymphatic network and a large lymphatic flow rate may affect the number of identified SNs and may be associated with metastasis in non-SN basins [38]. Although no significant difference with respect to OS were observed, CSS was significantly low in patients with LN metastasis in non-SN basins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Differences among categorical variables between risk factors and LNM were assessed using the χ test, the Fisher's exact test, or the Kruskal–Wallis H test, when appropriate, while those among continuous variables were evaluated using the one‐way anova. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify independent risk factors of LNM in EGC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those at a high risk of LNM, however, a radical gastrectomy with nodal dissection is required. Therefore, an accurate prediction of the risk of LNM in EGC is very important for clinical therapy decision‐making process and also for the patient's prognosis . Unfortunately, the risk of LNM in EGC remains elusive, even after clinical investigations with a combination of upper endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with EGC generally have an excellent prognosis after curative resection; the 5-year survival rate is reported to be around 90% [ 1 3 ]. It is well known that LNM in EGC is associated with prognosis [ 4 7 ], and predicting LNM preoperatively is very important for minimal treatment. However, it is still very difficult to precisely diagnose N-stage in EGC, even when endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%