2007
DOI: 10.1109/ispa.2007.4383746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxiliary Particle Implementation of the Probability Hypothesis Density Filter

Abstract: Optimal Bayesian multi-target filtering is, in general, computationally impractical owing to the high dimensionality of the multi-target state. The Probability Hypothesis Density (PHD) filter propagates the first moment of the multi-target posterior distribution. While this reduces the dimensionality of the problem, the PHD filter still involves intractable integrals in many cases of interest. Several authors have proposed Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) implementations of the PHD filter. However, these implement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15] the Gaussian mixture PHD filter is extended to linear Jump Markov multi-target models for tracking maneuvering targets. Recently, important developments such as the auxiliary particle-PHD filter [16] and measurement-oriented particle labeling technique [17], partially solve the clustering problem in the extraction of state estimates from the particle population. Clever uses of the PHD filter with measurement-driven birth intensity were independently proposed in [18] and [17] to improve tracking performance as well as obviating exact knowledge of the birth intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15] the Gaussian mixture PHD filter is extended to linear Jump Markov multi-target models for tracking maneuvering targets. Recently, important developments such as the auxiliary particle-PHD filter [16] and measurement-oriented particle labeling technique [17], partially solve the clustering problem in the extraction of state estimates from the particle population. Clever uses of the PHD filter with measurement-driven birth intensity were independently proposed in [18] and [17] to improve tracking performance as well as obviating exact knowledge of the birth intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual framework for efficient particle PHD filter implementa tion has been cast in [4]: the proposal (importance) densities for drawing persistent (surviving) and newborn target particles need to dependent on the latest measurement set (which typically includes target-originated as well as false detections). How to construct these importance densities has been the topic of intensive research in the last decade [5], [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with B (z) = /i;k+1 (z) + (gk+1(zl·), I' k+1lk) + PD(g k+1(zl · ), Dk+1lk ,p) (5) Dk+1 Ik+1,p (x) and Dk+1lk+1 ,b (X) are intensity functions of per sistent and newborn objects, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this intractability, the probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter [7] and the cardinalised PHD (CPHD) filter [8] were proposed as the moment and cardinality approximations. Now, the existing closed-form solutions of PHD mainly include particle filter PHD [9,10], Gaussian mixture PHD (GM-PHD) filter [11] and their modified versions [12][13][14][15]. However, these algorithms only have a good performance in the multi-target tracking systems with known measurement noise variances; otherwise, their tracking performance may decrease greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%