2003
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.007542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxin Acts in Xylem-Associated or Medullary Cells to Mediate Apical Dominance

Abstract: A role for auxin in the regulation of shoot branching was described originally in the Thimann and Skoog model, which proposes that apically derived auxin is transported basipetally directly into the axillary buds, where it inhibits their growth. Subsequent observations in several species have shown that auxin does not enter axillary buds directly. We have found similar results in Arabidopsis. Grafting studies indicated that auxin acts in the aerial tissue; hence, the principal site of auxin action is the shoot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
5
121
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unraveling the action of apically derived auxin has been challenging, mainly because auxin was found to move strictly downward in the vascular cambium of the stem (the polar auxin transport stream) and apparently cannot change direction to move upward to enter axillary buds and branches (Snow, 1937;Hall and Hillman, 1975;Morris, 1977;Morris and Thomas, 1978;Bangerth, 1989;Prasad et al, 1993;Booker et al, 2003). In addition, while apically derived auxin moved downward through live cells (Morris and Thomas, 1978), the inhibiting influence was able to be transmitted upward through dead tissue (Snow, 1929).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unraveling the action of apically derived auxin has been challenging, mainly because auxin was found to move strictly downward in the vascular cambium of the stem (the polar auxin transport stream) and apparently cannot change direction to move upward to enter axillary buds and branches (Snow, 1937;Hall and Hillman, 1975;Morris, 1977;Morris and Thomas, 1978;Bangerth, 1989;Prasad et al, 1993;Booker et al, 2003). In addition, while apically derived auxin moved downward through live cells (Morris and Thomas, 1978), the inhibiting influence was able to be transmitted upward through dead tissue (Snow, 1929).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is transported along the shoot-root axis from cell to cell in a polar manner, which is essential for inhibiting the outgrowth of axillary buds Leyser, 2003;Sieberer and Leyser, 2006). However, a large body of evidence suggests that auxin cannot directly enter the axillary buds and that a second messenger is required to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds (Shelagh and John, 1975;Morris, 1977;Pilate et al, 1989;Prasad et al, 1993;Booker et al, 2003). Cytokinin is the first reported second messenger candidate, which is synthesized in roots and transported acropetally in the xylem to promote directly the outgrowth of axillary buds (Van Dijck et al, 1988;Cline, 1991;Eklof et al, 1997;Kapchina-Toteva et al, 2000;Nordstrom et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auxin was first regarded as a direct regulator in this process [14], a notion strengthened thereafter by physiological studies on decapitated shoot apices [15][16][17], and by analyzing auxin biosynthesis, transport and signaling [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] in plants. However, when radiolabelled auxin was applied to a decapitated stump, the outgrowth of axillary buds was inhibited even though radiolabelled auxin was not found to accumulate in axillary buds, suggesting an indirect suppression effect of auxin on the AM outgrowth [28,30] and the presence of second messengers.Cytokinin has been proposed as a second messenger that mediates the action of auxin in controlling the apical dominance, because it promotes the outgrowth of lateral buds when directly applied to buds [31]. Although an antagonistic role of auxin and cytokinin in the regulation of apical dominance has been postulated for decades, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%