1988
DOI: 10.1080/21548331.1988.11703518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AV Block After Aortic Valve Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pathological changes include reversible elements such as edema. Repair of membranous ventricular septal defects (VSD) and atrial septal defects, as well as placement of mitral ring or prosthetic valves, may lead to edema of tissues surrounding the AV node and result in transient blocks [19, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pathological changes include reversible elements such as edema. Repair of membranous ventricular septal defects (VSD) and atrial septal defects, as well as placement of mitral ring or prosthetic valves, may lead to edema of tissues surrounding the AV node and result in transient blocks [19, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the timing of permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery is concerned, various opinions exist. Hancock [19] has recommended that permanent pacemaker be implanted if persistent high degree AV block is detected within 3 days after the surgical procedure, whereas Zakhia Doueihi et al [7] have recommended that a permanent pacemaker be placed on the 10 th day of postoperative heart block detection. In the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (ACC/AHA/NASPE) 2002 guideline, it has been concluded that AV blocks that develop following cardiac surgery have a variable course, and the decision of permanent pacemaker implantation is left to the physician [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certains auteurs soutiennent l'idée d'une implantation plus précoce. Hancock et al ont proposé que la présence d'un BAV complet durant 3 jours dans le post opératoire est une indication raisonnable pour la mise en place du pacemaker [ 16 ]. Kim et al proposent dans une série portant sur 155 patients opérés pour valvulopathie que le délai d'implantation définitif d'un pacemaker chez les patients présentant un BAV complet dans les 24 heures post intervention et persistant plus de 48 heures ne doit pas excéder sept jours [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified