2016
DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Availability of caregiver-friendly workplace policies (CFWPs): an international scoping review

Abstract: Little research has been done to summarise: what is currently available to caregiver‐employees (CEs), what types of employers are offering caregiver‐friendly workplace policies (CFWPs), and the characteristics of employers offering CFWPs. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the availability of CFWPs within workplaces on an international scale while being observant of how gender is implicated in care‐giving. This paper followed the Arksey & O’Malley (2005) methodology for conducting scoping review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent quantitative study that examined microaggressions experienced by Latinos, Nadal et al 12 found that female participants experienced more microaggressions in the workplace or school settings as compared to male participants. The majority of Caregiver-Employees (CEs)-defined as family members and other significant people who provide unpaid care and assistance to individuals living with debilitating physical, mental or cognitive conditions, while also working in paid employment 13 --are women, and their participation in the workforce provides both social and financial support to their unpaid caregiving role. Further, women seem to suffer more from the negative health consequences of caregiving than men 14 .…”
Section: Microaggressions Of Caregiver Employees: What Has Social Wormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent quantitative study that examined microaggressions experienced by Latinos, Nadal et al 12 found that female participants experienced more microaggressions in the workplace or school settings as compared to male participants. The majority of Caregiver-Employees (CEs)-defined as family members and other significant people who provide unpaid care and assistance to individuals living with debilitating physical, mental or cognitive conditions, while also working in paid employment 13 --are women, and their participation in the workforce provides both social and financial support to their unpaid caregiving role. Further, women seem to suffer more from the negative health consequences of caregiving than men 14 .…”
Section: Microaggressions Of Caregiver Employees: What Has Social Wormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, Caregiver-employees are defined as family members and other significant people who provide unpaid care and assistance to individuals living with debilitating physical, mental or cognitive conditions, while also working in paid employment 13 . Current evidence which illustrates the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of caregiver-friendly workplace policies (CFWPs) is needed if employers are to adopt and integrate CFWPs into their employment practices 13 . Consequently, the authors also interviewed twenty (n=20) managers working in the health care sector in the same region in Ontario, Canada, in order to explore their understandings of workplace policies that can assist CE's to manage their work and caregiving experiences.…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the knowledge base on working carers is steadily growing, there has been, to date, no comprehensive review to that end. Previous reviews have addressed specific solutions, namely workplace‐based support and technology, or looked at the challenges of combining work and caring for an older person (Andersson, Erlingsson, Magnusson, & Hanson, ; Calvano, ; Ireson, Sethi, & Williams, ). This review takes a more inclusive approach, not limiting itself to any specific solutions or age of people needing care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(713) In addition to its impact on employee health and well-being, high levels of WFC may also affect the company’s financial bottom line. (1416) Efforts to reduce WFC and improve employee health may directly affect organizational costs associated with health care utilization (17) and sick leave. (12) Many studies have also shown an association between physical and psychological health risks associated with WFC and decreased work performance (7, 8, 13, 1821) and increased turnover intentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%