Availability of essential medicines in selected public, primary and secondary health care institutions of a rural Sri Lankan district: a spot survey

Abstract

BackgroundAssessment of the availability of essential medicines, in rural areas of countries with free state health care system, is scarce. Dependence on essential medicines among the population in rural sector is considered to be high. Assessing the availability of essential medicines in selected state owned primary and secondary health care institutions of a rural district will help to identify areas where improvement is needed.MethodsA descriptive cross sectional study, covering selected five primary and one secondary care institutions of a rural Sri Lankan district, was conducted. The national list of essential medicines, Sri Lanka was used as the check list and the guidelines of the WHO–Health Action International were adapted.ResultsThe secondary care institution recorded an overall availability of 71%, whereas the average overall availability of the primary care institutions was 56%. Central dispensaries recorded the lowest availability. Lack of availability of medicines needed for the management of chronic kidney disease, snake bite and poisoning was noted.ConclusionsAvailability of essential medicines in most of the primary and the secondary care institutions were fairly high. Deficiency in medicines needed for the management of emergencies was noted. A need based annual estimate of medicines based on an essential medicine list is suggested.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1969-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of medication adherence between type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who pay for their medications and those who receive it free: a rural Asian experience

“…Expense is still a concern among patients who receive medications at universal-free pharmacies. A recent study revealed inadequacies in the availability of essential medicines at universal-free healthcare institutions of Anuradhapura [37]. Therefore, there might be an instance when the patient is expected to purchase part of the prescription from a fee-levying pharmacy.…”

Access to Essential Cardiovascular Medicines in Pakistan: A National Survey on the Availability, Price, and Affordability, Using WHO/HAI Methodology

“…WHO recommends that ideally the availability of 80% or more must be considered optimal for the Essential Medicines (EMs) ( WHO, 2015 ). We described the availability of medicines according to the following criteria, used by many WHO/HAI surveys: <30%: very low, 30–49%: low, 50–80%: fairly high, and >80%: high ( Rathish et al, 2017 ; Saeed et al, 2019 ). Associations between availability and other variables were analyzed using the binary logistic regression (available = 1, unavailable = 0).…”

Is patient navigation a solution to the problem of "leaving no one behind"? A scoping review of evidence from low-income countries

“…The people who most often embodied the status of navigators were Community Health Workers (CHWs) ( n = 16) ( Behforouz et al , 2004 ; Koenig et al , 2004 ; Mukherjee et al , 2006 ; Mukherjee and Eustache, 2007 ; Penny et al , 2007 ; Guinhouya et al , 2010 ; Ivers et al , 2011 ; Rich et al , 2012 ; Franke et al , 2013 ; Mugeni et al , 2014 ; Gupta et al , 2016 ; Reif et al , 2016 ; Ferrand et al , 2017 ; Matousek et al , 2017 ; Busza et al , 2018 ; Gignoux et al , 2018 ; Munyaneza et al , 2018 ; Rogers et al , 2018 ; van Diessen et al , 2018 ; Wroe et al , 2018 ), also known in Uganda as village health teams (VHTs) ( Altaras et al , 2017 ; Ekirapa-Kiracho et al , 2017 ; Musinguzi et al , 2017 ). Other individuals ( n = 13) were also implicated in navigation programmes, such as community own resource persons ( Kema et al , 2012 ), community health agents (CHAs) ( Savoie and Lambert, 2012 ), community cadres ( Patel et al , 2012 ), female community health volunteers (FCHVs) ( Andersen et al , 2013 ; Panday et al , 2017 ; Neupane et al , 2018 ), peer HIV educators ( Vu et al , 2017 ), peers (members of the community) ( Muzyamba, 2019 ), community-based rehabilitation workers ( Asher et al , 2018 ), lay counsellors ( Barnabas et al , 2016 ; Ware et al , 2016 ), community motivators ( Kandeh et al , 1997 ), community volunteers ( Seim et al , 2014 ) and community rela...…”