2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops 2017
DOI: 10.23919/ifipnetworking.2017.8264826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Available bandwidth estimation from passive TCP measurements using the probe gap model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analysis would be needed before fully committing to this algorithm. This is not only the case for this paper but for most papers published in this research topic [7]- [9]. They all suggest a new bandwidth estimation technique or modification and then continue to show some promising results in a simulated controlled environment.…”
Section: A Network Aware Routing In Kubernetesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further analysis would be needed before fully committing to this algorithm. This is not only the case for this paper but for most papers published in this research topic [7]- [9]. They all suggest a new bandwidth estimation technique or modification and then continue to show some promising results in a simulated controlled environment.…”
Section: A Network Aware Routing In Kubernetesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…1) Bandwidth and latency metrics: Gathering latency metrics is very easy and has almost no overhead on the network, but estimating throughput metrics on the other side is the complete opposite [5]- [7], [12]- [16]. This problem is then made more difficult by specifying the underlying network to be a multi-hop wireless mesh network.…”
Section: A Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of today, endpoints can infer the available bandwidth from their achieved TCP throughput; however, TCP throughput does not necessarily reflect the network available bandwidth, depending mostly on the congestion control strategy adopted. Another way to estimate it is to actively generate probes with specific traffic patterns as extensively documented in literature [16,63,40,48,58,19,26]. We detect some limitations in both these approaches.…”
Section: Available Bandwidth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tools implementing PGM include [63], and [43]. Based on PGM is [40], a work that takes a similar approach as SABES although with some very relevant differences: even though they use TCP acknowledgments to estimate available bandwidth, they take into account both the sending rate of the data packets and the receiving rate of the ACKs, following the probe-gap model proposal. SABES looks exclusively to the ACKs clocking and its distribution to determine the available bandwidth, making it suitable for receiver-side-only TCP based estimation; to the authors knowledge, no other tools implements such an approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%