Available space in feeders for housed sheep: social behavior and performance

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the effects of feeding space availability on social behavior and performance of housed crossbreed sheep through the use of three different types of feeders. Thirty-six crossbreed ewes (Santa Inês × Dorper; 2-3 years old) with initial body weight of 34.99±4.28 kg were randomly assigned to a 3 × 3 (feeder type × available space at the feeder) factorial arrangement among nine pens. Pens had one of three feeder types (concrete bunk, plastic, or wood barrel) and one of three amounts of available space in the feeder (0.33, 0.25, or 0.20 m animal −1 ). Total dry matter intake/pen, dry matter intake per animal, total weight gain/pen, daily weight gain/animal, and food waste were evaluated. Percentage of time spent at feeding and frequency of aggressive behaviors/12 h were recorded. We observed a higher total daily weight gain in ewes with a feeding space of 0.33 and 0.25 m animal −1 . The wastes were essentially insignificant for wood feeders in all feeding space treatments. The average number of aggressive behaviors was lower (P< 0.05) for animals kept in pens with feeding space of 0.33 m animal −1 than for those maintained in pens with feeding space of 0.20 and 0.25 m animal −1 . Ewes with feeding space of 0.33 m animal −1 fed simultaneously 54% of the time, while among pens with feeding spaces of 0.25 or 0.20 m animal −1 , this period was reduced to 41 and 30%, respectively. An available feeding space of 0.33 m animal −1 is recommended for adult housed ewes, once it favors simultaneous access, lower competitive interactions at the feeder, and less variation in terms of individual weight gain among ewes.

Sesame Meal, Vitamin E and Selenium Influence Goats’ Antioxidant Status

“…The alfalfa hay was provided separately from the concentrates, and they were both offered to the animals twice a day (in two equal parts at 08:00 and 18:30 h) after milking. The available feeding space was higher than that recommended for adult housed ewes [ 22 ] considering the more aggressive behavior of goats [ 23 ], in order to favor simultaneous access and lower competitive interactions at the feeder among animals. Thus, diet selectivity did not occur, and no refusals of forage and/or concentrates were observed.…”

Vorbereitende Studien zu Methoden der Wachstumslenkung am Schafsmodell

“…Rangniedrigere Schafe haben bei kleineren Futter-und Liegeflächen eine verkürzte Liegezeit, weniger zur Herde synchrones Ruhen und eine gesteigerte Bewegung (Bøe et al 2006) . Besonders bei geringem Platz am Futtertrog zeigt sich vermehrt aggressives Verhalten und aufgrund des unterschiedlichen Zugangs zu Nahrung sind größere Variationen im individuellen Gewicht innerhalb einer Herde feststellbar (Silveira et al 2018).…”