2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.051119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avalanche distributions in the two-dimensional nonequilibrium zero-temperature random field Ising model

Abstract: We present in detail the scaling analysis and data collapse of avalanche distributions and joint distributions that characterize the recently evidenced critical behavior of the two-dimensional nonequilibrium zero-temperature random field Ising model. The distributions are collected in extensive simulations of systems with linear sizes up to L=131072.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equilibrium RFIM has been shown to have a LCD equal to two [17], and the same is believed to be true for the front-propagation variant of the NE-RFIM [18]. For the nucleated model we study here, some suggest that the LCD is two [19,20], others suggest that power-laws are indeed able to capture the behavior and no crossover occurs in 2D [21,22], and some suggest that a lower critical dimension does not exist for this model [23][24][25][26]. Here, we derive the expected non-power-law scaling in the LCD from a nonlinear renormalization-group analysis, and find excellent agreement with the data presuming an LCD of two, while power-law scaling fails to capture the behavior.• Is the value of the critical disorder in D = 2 zero, or positive?…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equilibrium RFIM has been shown to have a LCD equal to two [17], and the same is believed to be true for the front-propagation variant of the NE-RFIM [18]. For the nucleated model we study here, some suggest that the LCD is two [19,20], others suggest that power-laws are indeed able to capture the behavior and no crossover occurs in 2D [21,22], and some suggest that a lower critical dimension does not exist for this model [23][24][25][26]. Here, we derive the expected non-power-law scaling in the LCD from a nonlinear renormalization-group analysis, and find excellent agreement with the data presuming an LCD of two, while power-law scaling fails to capture the behavior.• Is the value of the critical disorder in D = 2 zero, or positive?…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…This behavior in conjunction with the observation that for both the equilibrium and front-propagation problems, r c is found arXiv:1906.10568v2 [cond-mat.dis-nn] 13 Aug 2019 to be zero [18] suggests that r c may be quite small. Early work on the nucleated model, presuming power law scaling [20,28,29], yielded positive r c = 0.75 ± 0.03 [28], but more recent work on larger systems finds a smaller r c = 0.54 ± 0.02 [21,22] collapsing over a small range r ∈ [0.64, 0.70]. Our non-power-law scaling form would predict that power-law fits at a given system size should succeed in small ranges of disorder, but that larger system sizes will yield lower and lower predicted critical disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disordered ferromagnetic films exhibiting criticality at the hysteresis loop [4,11,[16][17][18] are conveniently modeled by two-dimensional random-field Ising model (2D-RFIM) [19][20][21], as described in Section II. Besides, these model systems are also of high importance for theoretical considerations for the following reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, and critical exponents obtained through this analysis are given in Table I these are in good agreement with the corresponding exponents obtained through the scaling relations (within statistical error). The collapsing width for the various curves was also calculated [41]. Although in the present study the network is externally driven to criticality by varying the control parameter λ, avalanches showing power-law behaviour also form an integral part of the study of self-organized critical neuronal systems [10].…”
Section: Avalanche Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(15)(16)(17). We study networks with degree K = 4 and system size N = 1024 2 at the critical point (for µ = 1) and compute joint distributions [41,42] for four pairs of the above related quantities, size-duration (see Fig. 3) as well as size-magnitude, size-area and size-energy (which are not shown here).…”
Section: Avalanche Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%