2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avalanche dynamics of a generalized earthquake model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, OFC models on different topologies have been explored previously. The anisotropic version, [12][13][14] randomneighbor version, [15][16][17][18] quenched random graph, [19,20] smallworld, [21,22] scale-free, [23][24][25][26] random spatial network, [27] and other different topology models [28][29][30] have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, OFC models on different topologies have been explored previously. The anisotropic version, [12][13][14] randomneighbor version, [15][16][17][18] quenched random graph, [19,20] smallworld, [21,22] scale-free, [23][24][25][26] random spatial network, [27] and other different topology models [28][29][30] have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is probably [7] the most studied non-conservative, supposedly, SOC model and has been a mainstream tool to study the SOC behavior of earthquake dynamics, because it can reproduce many critical features of real-world earthquakes, see ref. [33] and references therein. In particular, in the OFC model, it was found (see fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%