2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação comparativa da perda de retenção de quatro sistemas de encaixes do tipo ERA e O-Ring empregados sob overdentures em função do tempo de uso

Abstract: objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar e comparar a capacidade retentiva entre dois sistemas O-ring e O-SO (Grupo I) e dois sistemas ERA -cápsulas de retenção cinza e brancas -(Grupo II), em função simulada, com ciclos de inserção e remoção, do início, 6 meses, 1, 2, 3, 4 e 5 anos depois. Dois implantes do tipo Brånemark foram fixados em duas bases metálicas trapezoidais, sendo os testes de inserção e remoção feitos numa máquina de costura ajustada para este propósito, usando um sistema de correias e polias, move… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the attachment design, a gradual loss of retention over time is inevitable due to the nature of the materials and the stress suffered during continuous insertion and disinsertion cycles. 13,14 The concave reconstructive sphere system enabled the reshaping of worn attachments, thus representing a valuable solution for restoring their retentive force without removal of the intraradicular post, which would involve a high risk of root fracture, obviated with this conservative strategy. Moreover, the Teflon cap of the system fits into the standard Rhein83 ® stainless -steel housings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the attachment design, a gradual loss of retention over time is inevitable due to the nature of the materials and the stress suffered during continuous insertion and disinsertion cycles. 13,14 The concave reconstructive sphere system enabled the reshaping of worn attachments, thus representing a valuable solution for restoring their retentive force without removal of the intraradicular post, which would involve a high risk of root fracture, obviated with this conservative strategy. Moreover, the Teflon cap of the system fits into the standard Rhein83 ® stainless -steel housings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 30 ] Studies have classified the attachment systems into high (ERA gray), medium (Locator LR white, Spheroflex ball, Hader bar and metal clip, ERA white), low (Locator LR pink), and very low (Shiner magnet, Maxi magnet, Magnedisc magnet) retention groups. [ 19 ] Significantly higher retention and stability are provided by Locator connectors[ 30 ] and Sterngold ERA,[ 31 32 ] compared to Nobel Biocare ball connectors. [ 33 ] These findings were confirmed by several studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical fatigue also induced some retention loss of the attachment systems during the experiment after 15,000 fatigue cycles,[ 31 38 49 ] even though it was of little valuewhen compared to the initial retentive forces. [ 23 ] Multiple pulls reduced the retentive values of the Locator attachments significantly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relatou a reabilitação protética de um paciente com recorrência de granuloma central de células gigantes. A prótese obturadora cirúrgica ou imediata confeccionada para ser instalada durante o ato cirúrgico, foi posteriormente modificada em uma prótese obturadora provisória para vedamento do espaço velofaríngeo, enquanto os tecidos moles ao redor do defeito palatal cicatrizassem.Ao final da cicatrização foi confeccionada uma prótese obturadora retida pelo sistema barra-clipe, verificando-se acentuada melhora na fala, mastigação e deglutição do paciente Bonachela et al (2003). descreveram que, em estudo feito entre o sistema Oring e o sistema ERA®, ambos os sistemas de encaixes apresentaram perda de retenção ao longo do tempo, sendo que o sistema ERA® desde o início apresentou maior retenção quando comparado ao sistema O-ring.…”
unclassified