Avaliação da produção científica, patentes e formação de recursos humanos da Enfermagem Brasileira

Abstract

RESUMOObjetivo:avaliar produção científica, patentes e formação de recursos humanos de pesquisadores da enfermagem com bolsas de produtividade em pesquisa (PQ) no CNPq na série histórica 2000-2012; verificar a associação entre esta produção e características dos pesquisadores quanto a sexo, formação e origem.Método:estudo transversal analítico cujo critério de inclusão foi ser pesquisador PQ/CNPq da enfermagem no período em questão. Foram analisados curriculum lattes de 208 pesquisadores com bolsas entre 2000-2012. Para as análises estatísticas utilizou-se o programa SPSS®.Resultados:o estudo aponta predominância do sexo feminino, concentração na região Sudeste e existência de associação entre produção científica, patentes e formação de recursos humanos e a formação, sexo e origem do pesquisador.Conclusão:o estudo revela uma expressiva participação dos pesquisadores PQ/CNPq da enfermagem na produção científica e na formação de recursos humanos e tímida participação na produção de patentes.

Scientific production of researchers in the Nutrition field with productivity fellowships from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development

“…Most of the productivity research grant/ CNPq nutrition researchers are located in the Southeast region of Brazil, especially in the state of São Paulo, consistent with studies on researchers in other areas of knowledge [12,13,27]. This fact may be related to the historical concentration of graduate courses in nutrition in this region [1,7].…”

“…As expected for productivity research grant/CNPq researchers, those evaluated in the present study were qualified to train new professionals. This was confirmed by the number of supervisions carried out, from scientific initiation to postdoctoral studies, which can be considered to be high when compared to the results of studies on human resources training in Brazil in the areas of Nursing [13] and Pediatrics [33].…”

“…The curricula were then analyzed to characterize the researchers and collect bibliometric data regarding their scientific production, following previous studies [10][11][12][13]20]. The characterization of the researcher consisted of determining their gender, degree, the type of grant (2, 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D or senior) received, the federative unit (professional address), the institution and country where the PhD (stricto sensu) was obtained and the postdoctoral studies were developed, the number of years of experience after completing their PhD (stricto sensu), and the research area based on the categories of the Lattes Platform (Nutrition, Biochemistry of Nutrition, Epidemiology, Public Health, and Maternal and Child Health).…”

“…Several studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] have analyzed the profiles and scientific production of researchers with productivity research grants in different areas of knowledge. The bibliometric indicators used in these studies include the number of people who have received academic or scientific qualifications, the number of patents registered by scientists, the number of scientific articles published, the number of scientists who have published scientific articles, the number of bibliographical references cited in scientific articles, the number of citations per scientific article, the number of research grants awarded to scientists, and the amount of resources allocated to the research activities promoted by the various agencies [17].…”

Scientific production indicators and researchers training in the Brazilian Collective Health

“…Scientific and technological production and researchers training has gained increasing prominence in academic and governmental spaces. Scientific indicators are increasingly used to evaluate the development of thematic areas of knowledge and the development process of nations (12) , so it is important to evaluate the scientific and technological production and researchers training in Collective Health, in order to contribute for a better knowledge about the profile of this production and to point out information that contribute to a discussion about the need for policies aimed at the deconcentration of scientific production in the country.…”