2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbo.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da reprodutibilidade das diferentes descrições da classificação de Kellgren e Lawrence para osteoartrite do joelho

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the original report showed a “significant” interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the KL classification [ 13 ], subsequent studies show conflicting results with varying levels of interobserver and intraobserver reliability [ 10 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] (Table 4 ). One of the reasons for this discrepancy among studies is the variability in the descriptions of the original KL classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the original report showed a “significant” interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the KL classification [ 13 ], subsequent studies show conflicting results with varying levels of interobserver and intraobserver reliability [ 10 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] (Table 4 ). One of the reasons for this discrepancy among studies is the variability in the descriptions of the original KL classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade 0 signifying absence of OA and Grade 4 severe OA (Table 1 ) [ 9 ]. Several studies have reported on the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the KL classification with varying results that range from poor to substantial agreement [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%