2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2001000800002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação de métodos de correção do estande para estimar a produtividade em milho

Abstract: Este trabalho objetivou determinar o método de correção de estande mais adequado aos dados de produtividade na cultura do milho, na avaliação de 33 cultivares, em oito ambientes. Os métodos avaliados foram: sem correção, regra de três, método de Zuber, covariância de estande médio, covariância de estande ideal, o método proposto por Cruz, o método proposto por Vencovsky & Cruz, e o proposto neste trabalho, de correção estratificada com base no agrupamento de cultivares, para a característica estande, pelo … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
30

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the lack of uniformity of the plants in some plots, grain yield was estimated by the formula of Zuber (Schimidt et al, 2001;Nascimento et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the lack of uniformity of the plants in some plots, grain yield was estimated by the formula of Zuber (Schimidt et al, 2001;Nascimento et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other plants of the experimental unit were manually harvested in order to determine grain yield, which was carried out by calculating the weight of the product obtained in all the experimental unit per hectare, at 13% of average humidity. Covariance -Ideal Stand method, described by Schmildt et al (2001), was used for correction of grain yield due to the heterogeneity of plant stand. Mineral concentration was determined in random samples of 500 g grains of the F 6:8 line and of parents from each replication, in each growing season.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Advanced Generationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain yield was determined by extrapolating the weight of the product obtained in each plot per hectare. As the plant stands were heterogeneous, it was necessary to adjust the plant stands for grain yield in all experimental units by the covariance -ideal stand method (Schmildt et al, 2001).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Agronomic and Mineral Biofortification Traits mentioning
confidence: 99%