2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avenues to the financial viability of microbial electrolysis cells [MEC] for domestic wastewater treatment and hydrogen production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 5 grades of graphite tested, G1, G2, and G3 are the least expensive and are in the same range of price when G4 and G5 are significantly more expensive (up to twice as expensive for G5). Considering that anode materials account for 75% of an upscaled MEC total material cost (Aiken et al, 2019), using a lowend graphite such as G1, G2, or G3 with a price twice as low as G5 would decrease up-scaled MECs investment costs by almost 40%. A case study about investment costs for the implementation of MECs in domestic wastewater treatment plants by Escapa et al (2012) proposes a scenario in which a 108,300 m² bioanode produces a current density of 2.5 A/m², which is the same order of magnitude of the average current densities produced by the G3 bioanodes.…”
Section: Graphite Selection Considering Cost Of Investment and Mechanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 5 grades of graphite tested, G1, G2, and G3 are the least expensive and are in the same range of price when G4 and G5 are significantly more expensive (up to twice as expensive for G5). Considering that anode materials account for 75% of an upscaled MEC total material cost (Aiken et al, 2019), using a lowend graphite such as G1, G2, or G3 with a price twice as low as G5 would decrease up-scaled MECs investment costs by almost 40%. A case study about investment costs for the implementation of MECs in domestic wastewater treatment plants by Escapa et al (2012) proposes a scenario in which a 108,300 m² bioanode produces a current density of 2.5 A/m², which is the same order of magnitude of the average current densities produced by the G3 bioanodes.…”
Section: Graphite Selection Considering Cost Of Investment and Mechanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first involves reducing the construction costs of MECs as much as possible without affecting their performance. Aiken et al (2019) recently established that anodic materials represent up to 75% of the total material cost of a MEC at an industrial scale. In this context, the anode material must be carefully chosen to minimize its impact on investment costs and ensure its durability to guarantee a sustainable investment for the exploitation of the technology in the long term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For calculation of energy potential from wastewater by MFC is based on the real time experimental results which is 3.7 W/m 3 (Gude, 2016). Finally calculation of hydrogen by MEC from wastewater is calculated based on the practical assumption which is (15L-H 2 /m 3 -influent/day) (Aiken et al, 2019) and energetic estimation has been done considering 1 kg of H 2 is equivalent to 33.33 kWh energy ( H 2 data).…”
Section: Calculation Of Energy Potential From Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few common technologies like AD, MHP already implemented and producing energy form the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the some part of the world particularly in the developed countries (Strazzabosco et al, 2020), (Bousquet et al, 2017). Few other emerging technologies like photocatalysis, photo fermentation Microbial photo electrochemical system( MPEC) and MEC/MFC) are promising technologies and extensive research is in place presently but technology readiness level(TRL) still within 1-7 (Lin et al, 2018), (Demir et al, 2019), (Jafary et al, 2019), (Aiken et al, 2019).Out of these technologies MFC and MEC are most emerging technology as energy generation and simultaneous wastewater treatment is possible. (Cusick et al, 2011), (Tartakovsky et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such areas can take the form of corrosive cracks ( Figure 1A) or originate in a failure of the anti-corrosive coating ( Figure 1B). This leads to the hydrogenation of the alloy [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Hydrogen permeation from solutions is due to the reduction of hydrogen derived from the solution during the cathodic process [20,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%