2013
DOI: 10.3182/20130902-3-cn-3020.00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average Consensus in Multi-Agent Systems with Non-uniform Time-Varying Delays and Random Packet Losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key ingredient to the approach proposed in [9] is to analytically calculate the expectation of the Laplacian L σ k and the product L ⊤ σ k L σ k . Similar calculations were performed before in [5] without exposing the inherent structure of the result, which is required for decoupling. However, neither result is applicable to stochastic Laplacians as resulting from Assumption 1 because both require homogeneous loss probabilities and independence in time, i.e., p ij = q ij = p for all e ij ∈ E 0 .…”
Section: Expected Laplacians With Heterogeneous Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A key ingredient to the approach proposed in [9] is to analytically calculate the expectation of the Laplacian L σ k and the product L ⊤ σ k L σ k . Similar calculations were performed before in [5] without exposing the inherent structure of the result, which is required for decoupling. However, neither result is applicable to stochastic Laplacians as resulting from Assumption 1 because both require homogeneous loss probabilities and independence in time, i.e., p ij = q ij = p for all e ij ∈ E 0 .…”
Section: Expected Laplacians With Heterogeneous Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a rich literature on analysing MJLSs, both in terms of stability and system performance. A direct application of the general analysis conditions does, however, lead to a combinatorial explosion for MASs with more than a few tens of agents and even applying simplifications as proposed in [5] does not allow to consider truly large-scale MAS due to the remaining quadratic scaling of the computational complexity in terms of the number of agents. For that reason, existing approaches on MASs with stochastic packet loss require additional assumptions on the packet loss model and are C. Hespe and H. Werner are with the Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Control Systems, Eißendorfer Straße 40, 21073 Hamburg, Germany, {christian.hespe, h.werner}@tuhh.de mostly concerned with stability analysis rather than system performance: Many results rely on having identical packet loss, that is, all links fail at the same time [6], which is a very restrictive assumption and violated in almost all real world scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation