2018
DOI: 10.4171/jems/842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average decay of the Fourier transform of measures with applications

Abstract: We consider spherical averages of the Fourier transform of fractal measures and improve both the upper and lower bounds on the rate of decay. Maximal estimates with respect to fractal measures are deduced for the Schrödinger and wave equations. This refines the almost everywhere convergence of the solution to its initial datum as time tends to zero. A consequence is that the solution to the wave equation cannot diverge on a (d − 1)-dimensional manifold if the data belongs to the energy spaceḢ 1 (R d ) × L 2 (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in Section 2, it is standard that this estimate implies pointwise convergence e it∆ f (x) → f (x) as t → 0 for almost every x ∈ T d . The problem of identifying the minimal regularity s for which (27) holds is still open. The following result has been proved in [32] when d = 1 and in [47] when d ≥ 2.…”
Section: The Linear Schrödinger Equation On T Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in Section 2, it is standard that this estimate implies pointwise convergence e it∆ f (x) → f (x) as t → 0 for almost every x ∈ T d . The problem of identifying the minimal regularity s for which (27) holds is still open. The following result has been proved in [32] when d = 1 and in [47] when d ≥ 2.…”
Section: The Linear Schrödinger Equation On T Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that µ is α-dimensional if it is a probability measure supported in the unit ball B n (0, 1) and satisfies that (1.4) µ(B(x, r)) ≤ C µ r α , ∀r > 0, ∀x ∈ R n . Lemma 1.5 (Lucà-Rogers, Lemma 7.1 in [14]). Let α > α 0 ≥ n − 2s and suppose that sup…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a consequence of the Dahlberg-Kenig example combined with [1], where it was proven that α n (s) ≤ n − 2s in the range n/4 ≤ s ≤ n/2. For the best known upper bounds with lower regularity, see [14,Theorem 1.2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%