1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01450654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average growth estimates for hyperplane sections of entire analytic sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the estimate with what was proved in the preceding Section leads us to the following theorem of MoIzon, Shiffman and Sibony [89]. Combining the estimate with what was proved in the preceding Section leads us to the following theorem of MoIzon, Shiffman and Sibony [89].…”
Section: Then Clearlysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Combining the estimate with what was proved in the preceding Section leads us to the following theorem of MoIzon, Shiffman and Sibony [89]. Combining the estimate with what was proved in the preceding Section leads us to the following theorem of MoIzon, Shiffman and Sibony [89].…”
Section: Then Clearlysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Remark. Under the assumptions of Example 1, the div-capacity on M differs from the projective logarithmic capacity recently introduced by Molzon, Shiffman, and Sibony [8] only by a constant factor. However, if Q is a submanifold in the projective space dual to M and if a hyperplane G C M is polar to a point that does not belong to Q, then G has a positive div-capacity, while the projective logarithmic capacity of any hyperplane is zero.…”
Section: Theorem 1 For Any Function ~ 6 9 and Any Value A E M One Hmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It seems that in previous work (see Shabat [17], GriffithsKing [9]), the claim is that "most" points are covered without a quantitative measure of the size of the defect locus. For analytic sets there are earlier results in this direction for the average growth of a hyperplane section, see Gruman [12], Molzon-Shiffman-Sibony [16].…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, as already noted, a nonpluripolar set E is too large to be exceptional in this sense, cf. [16]. Now let us consider defect relations such as (5.11) for dimensions other than k − 1, i.e., for D of dimension other than m − 1.…”
Section: If Lim Inf R→r T0(r)mentioning
confidence: 99%