1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.15.2098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average neutron energies from separated delayed-neutron precursors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that this level of agreement could only be 540 reached after correction of some bugs [48] in Geant4 which have been incorporated in version 10.0 and later versions of the code. The ratio between the counts of the inner and the outer ring of 3 He tubes is quite sensitive to the neutron energy distribution [10]. The measured ratio is 1.499(3) in quite good 545 agreement with the result of the simulation 1.52.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that this level of agreement could only be 540 reached after correction of some bugs [48] in Geant4 which have been incorporated in version 10.0 and later versions of the code. The ratio between the counts of the inner and the outer ring of 3 He tubes is quite sensitive to the neutron energy distribution [10]. The measured ratio is 1.499(3) in quite good 545 agreement with the result of the simulation 1.52.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The process becomes dominant far enough from stability. The β-delayed neutron emission probability P n conveys information about the distribution and nature of nuclear levels populated in the decay, which is dictated by nuclear shell structure 10 and residual interactions [1]. P n values are also important inputs for the description of the astrophysical r process responsible for the synthesis of about half of the observed abundance of elements heavier than iron [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, 2. Other methods to determine the sample strength involve the counting of the number of ions reaching the collector [3] or the counting of the number of atoms of a more long-lived decay product [4]. Indirect determinations of the sample strength via fission yields have often been used (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%