“…The bottom panel of Fig. 2 compares the achieved uncertainties to the most precise previous measurement: we observe that such low uncertainties on a broad energy range were never reached before, not even with different experimental techniques ([8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] and [6,30,31]). At low E n in , below 5 MeV, the averaged relative difference between our data and ENDF/B-VIII.0 values, shown in Fig.…”
Measuring prompt fission neutrons to high precision is an experimental challenge, especially for radioactive fissioning nuclides. However, accurate average multiplicities,
ν
¯
p
, and kinetic energy distributions of prompt fission neutrons are essential for fundamental and applied nuclear physics. We present here a recent measurement of the 239Pu (n,f)
ν
¯
p
as a function of the incident-neutron energy, over the range 1-700 MeV. The measurement was performed with a cutting-edge setup and an innovative technique, which allowed to minimize and account for the main sources of bias. An unprecedented precision was therefore achieved. Our data are compared to GEF predictions as well as to evaluated libraries. For the first time, at low energies, the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data evaluation is validated with an independent measurement and the evaluated uncertainty reduced by up to 60%. This work paves the way to precisely measure prompt fission neutron multiplicities on highly radioactive nuclei.
“…The bottom panel of Fig. 2 compares the achieved uncertainties to the most precise previous measurement: we observe that such low uncertainties on a broad energy range were never reached before, not even with different experimental techniques ([8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] and [6,30,31]). At low E n in , below 5 MeV, the averaged relative difference between our data and ENDF/B-VIII.0 values, shown in Fig.…”
Measuring prompt fission neutrons to high precision is an experimental challenge, especially for radioactive fissioning nuclides. However, accurate average multiplicities,
ν
¯
p
, and kinetic energy distributions of prompt fission neutrons are essential for fundamental and applied nuclear physics. We present here a recent measurement of the 239Pu (n,f)
ν
¯
p
as a function of the incident-neutron energy, over the range 1-700 MeV. The measurement was performed with a cutting-edge setup and an innovative technique, which allowed to minimize and account for the main sources of bias. An unprecedented precision was therefore achieved. Our data are compared to GEF predictions as well as to evaluated libraries. For the first time, at low energies, the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data evaluation is validated with an independent measurement and the evaluated uncertainty reduced by up to 60%. This work paves the way to precisely measure prompt fission neutron multiplicities on highly radioactive nuclei.
“…Ref. [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. I am happy to report that I am satisfied with the level of development of technical skill that I was afforded to achieve this summer.…”
Section: Description Of the Research Projectmentioning
Nuclear data and their associated co-variances are constantly being reevaluated as techniques improve and as new experimental data, as well as nuclearmodel developments, emerge. A standard technique used to evaluate mean values in nuclear data, and their associated covariances, is the generalized linear least squares (GLLS) method. Aligning with recent efforts to incorporate measurement features into nuclear data evaluation, we augment GLLS by including a linear term which attempts to predict potential systematic discrepancies in experimental data as related to the measurement features. Due to the general nature of this augmentation, we are able to apply this evaluation to three key observables: neutroninduced fission cross sections, the average prompt neutron multiplicity, and the prompt-fission neutron spectrum of 239 Pu.
“…2b and 3). Such low uncertainties on a broad energy range were never reached before, not even with different experimental techniques ( [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and [5,9,13]) as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the impact of our data compared to existing data sets, we performed two new evaluations of 239 Pu ν p , with (Ev w/ this work ) and without the data presented here (Ev w/o this work ), using the same methodology. The uncertainties of the all data [8,9,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]24] were carefully reviewed and increased according to [57] in cases where uncertainties were missing. Our data reduce the ENDF/B-VIII.0 and Ev w/o this work ν p evaluated relative uncertainty, σ ev ν p , by up to 50% and 60%, respectively, in the 1 to 15 MeV range (see dashed lines in Fig.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.