1982
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0190(82)90110-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average time analysis of simplified Davis-Putnam procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If q=q(n) approaches C } n for a constant C the following results are known about Form n (q, 3): The average size of the whole backtracking tree of a simplified Davis Putnam procedure is exponential in n [2,9]. (There are different families of input spaces where this size is polynomial [10].) For almost all unsatisfiable formulas from Form n (q, 3) the length of the shortest resolution proof is exponential, i.e, (1+=) n for a fixed =>0 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If q=q(n) approaches C } n for a constant C the following results are known about Form n (q, 3): The average size of the whole backtracking tree of a simplified Davis Putnam procedure is exponential in n [2,9]. (There are different families of input spaces where this size is polynomial [10].) For almost all unsatisfiable formulas from Form n (q, 3) the length of the shortest resolution proof is exponential, i.e, (1+=) n for a fixed =>0 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A historically important example is the Boolean satisfiability where each clause is generated by selecting literals with some fixed probability. Goldberg introduced this random ensemble and showed that the average running time of the Davis-Putnam algorithm [DP60,DLL62] is polynomial for almost all choices of parameter settings [Gol79,GPB82]. Thus in the eighties some computer scientist tended to think that all the NP-complete problems are in fact on average easy and it is hard to find the evil instances which makes them NP-complete.…”
Section: The Average Case Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the "unbiased" sample space when p = 1 3 and all expressions are equally likely. Later work [49] showed the same average-case complexity even if pure literals are handled as well. The scientific and engineering communities are often interested in proofs of unsatisfiability, but Goldberg made no mention of the frequency of unsatisfiable random CNF expressions over the parameter space of that distribution.…”
Section: A History Of Probabilistic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%