2007
DOI: 10.2514/1.28949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Averaging Quaternions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
156
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
156
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the translation and rotation parts of the transformation matrix are split, and the rotation matrices are transformed into quaternions. Markley et al (2007) proposed an exact solution for averaging quaternions based on minimizing a weighted sum of squared Frobenius norms. However, as the differences between rotations in our case are small, we use an approximate solution also provided by Markley et al (2007), where quaternions are averaged using , ) (…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the translation and rotation parts of the transformation matrix are split, and the rotation matrices are transformed into quaternions. Markley et al (2007) proposed an exact solution for averaging quaternions based on minimizing a weighted sum of squared Frobenius norms. However, as the differences between rotations in our case are small, we use an approximate solution also provided by Markley et al (2007), where quaternions are averaged using , ) (…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected method has two known flaws (Markley et al, 2007). The first flaw is that the resulting quaternion is no longer a unit quaternion.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, if ( ( ), ( ) ) of all CCD are known, then can be directly calibrated by Equation (28) using GCPs. (3) According to the equivalent relationship between the attitude matrix and the attitude quaternion, along with quaternion theory [44], the difference between the on-board and post-processed attitudes can be calculated by ∆ = ⊗ , where denotes the post-processed attitude, and denotes the on-board attitude. The quaternion deviation∆ can be transformed to the Euler angle defined in J2000 [45,46].…”
Section: Attitude Accuracy Comparison and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFC was performed asking the users to change the probe position 40 times in a water tank with a planar membrane in the bottom, changing the configuration of a mechanical linkage that held the probe still while the DRF poses were acquired and averaged. 36 In the experiments, the water temperature was monitored constantly using a digital multimeter (IDM-62T, ISO-tech, United Kingdom).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%