2017
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.155507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avian thermoregulation in the heat: evaporative cooling in five Australian passerines reveals within-order biogeographic variation in heat tolerance

Abstract: Evaporative heat loss pathways vary among avian orders, but the extent to which evaporative cooling capacity and heat tolerance vary within orders remains unclear. We quantified the upper limits to thermoregulation under extremely hot conditions in five Australian passerines: yellow-plumed honeyeater (; ∼17 g), spiny-cheeked honeyeater (; ∼42 g), chestnut-crowned babbler (; ∼52 g), grey butcherbird (; ∼86 g) and apostlebird (; ∼118 g). At air temperatures () exceeding body temperature (), all five species show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
109
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
27
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests they did not work as hard as control parents, because previous studies of blue tits demonstrate that adult mass loss increases when workload is higher or experimentally increased (Nur, ). In our study, it is possible that energy expenditure was lower in feather‐clipped birds because they were less affected by the metabolic cost of panting (McKechnie et al, ; Whitfield et al, ) during recovery, and so could maintain body mass to a larger extent than control birds (cf. du Plessis et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests they did not work as hard as control parents, because previous studies of blue tits demonstrate that adult mass loss increases when workload is higher or experimentally increased (Nur, ). In our study, it is possible that energy expenditure was lower in feather‐clipped birds because they were less affected by the metabolic cost of panting (McKechnie et al, ; Whitfield et al, ) during recovery, and so could maintain body mass to a larger extent than control birds (cf. du Plessis et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Simmons, Lott, & May, ). This might have increased self‐maintenance costs in the control treatment, because panting is the energetically most expensive method of evaporative cooling (McKechnie et al, ; Whitfield, Smit, McKechnie, & Wolf, ) and is largely incompatible with efficient self‐foraging (du Plessis, Martin, Hockey, Cunningham, & Ridley, ). This could explain why, in line with the HDL theory, control birds sired offspring that were structurally smaller (Figure b), and sometimes lighter (Figure a), than those of clipped birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for 32 of the species included in this study were previously published (McKechnie et al, ; McKechnie, Smit et al, ; McKechnie, Whitfield et al, ; McWhorter et al, ; Smit et al, ; Smith, O'Neill, Gerson, McKechnie, & Wolf, ; Smith et al, ; Talbot, Gerson, Smith, McKechnie, & Wolf, ; Talbot, McWhorter, Gerson, McKechnie, & Wolf, ; Whitfield et al, ) see Table S2), whereas the remaining species (red‐billed buffalo‐weaver , Bubalornis niger ) has not been published elsewhere. The published studies detail the conditions of capture, holding and how temperature trials were performed, which all followed similar protocols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a), and weather records show that birds may be exposed to up to 8 consecutive days of such conditions. Birds at our temperate study site are not acclimatized to very hot conditions so mass loss associated with repeated exposure to temperatures between 30 and 35°C is perhaps not surprising, particularly given recent evidence that temperature thresholds for the onset of panting and heat stress vary among species [30,57,62]. Smit and colleagues [30] showed that among 30 species of arid zone birds in South Africa the HD50 values for panting ranged between 31.3-46.0.°C (mean 39.3°C).…”
Section: Spring and Summermentioning
confidence: 99%