2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding artefacts when counting polymerized actin in live cells with LifeAct fused to fluorescent proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
179
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
22
179
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis was based on center-to-center measurements between filaments, which means that the sharp drop-off below 12 nm translates into a minimum distance of only 4.5 nm between two 7.5-nm-thick filaments. Note that these measurements are in large agreement with an estimate of ∼15 nm based on quantitative fluorescence microscopy (11).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis was based on center-to-center measurements between filaments, which means that the sharp drop-off below 12 nm translates into a minimum distance of only 4.5 nm between two 7.5-nm-thick filaments. Note that these measurements are in large agreement with an estimate of ∼15 nm based on quantitative fluorescence microscopy (11).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…On average, there were 34 (SD = 12) filaments per bundle cross-section, with individual numbers ranging between 14 and 60 filaments (Fig. 5), which was largely compatible with quantitative fluorescence microscopy that estimated there would be ∼50 filaments per ring cross-section (11). The majority of filaments traversed the entire thickness of the tomographic section, but many filament ends were visible as well (arrowheads in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…2B). We note that although a recent report suggests that LifeAct may affect actin dynamics (Courtemanche et al, 2016), we find that several LifeAct::TagRFP-expressing transgenes do not cause any EC phenotypes (Shaye and Greenwald, 2015), and LifeAct remains a reliable marker for measuring total Factin (Courtemanche et al, 2016; see also below). Venus::INFT-2, shown to function in the EC as described below, also colocalizes with F-actin, and colocalization was lost in cdc-42(0*) mutants (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4A,B; Materials and Methods). We note that although recent evidence suggests that LifeAct may affect actin polymerization kinetics, it remains a reliable marker for measuring the total number of polymerized actin molecules (Courtemanche et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cyk-1 Regulates Inft-2-dependent F-actin Levels and Inft-2 Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that, in contrast to expression in somatic cells or weak expression in the germline, a strong expression of LifeAct in the Drosophila germline results in severe actin remodeling and fertility defects (Spracklen et al, 2014). Moreover, it has been shown that LifeAct affects actin assembly during endocytosis and cytokinesis in fission yeast (Courtemanche et al, 2016). Although the underlying mechanisms are not well understood, both studies claim that the LifeAct-mediated effects on actin dynamics are concentration-dependent and thus suggest that the use of LifeAct requires a more elaborate optimization process.…”
Section: Live-cell Imaging Using Gfp-actin Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%