2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in extracardiac cavopulmonary connection: Does it really matter?

Abstract: Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in fenestrated extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection had no direct effect on the early outcome variables.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Off-bypass Fontan completion has been demonstrated to attenuate proinflammatory markers; however, multiple studies have been unable to establish consistent clinical improvements (278, 279). The largest and most recent series to evaluate Fontan completion without cardiopulmonary bypass found no difference in immediate postoperative pressures or in early outcomes including chest tube drainage, arrhythmias, or mechanical ventilation (280). Although avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass at completion Fontan in HLHS is safe and can be done with consistent results, it appears at this juncture to have no clinical benefit to patient care and will require more study if it is to become widely adopted.…”
Section: Stage III (Fontan Operation; Total Cavopulmonary Connection)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-bypass Fontan completion has been demonstrated to attenuate proinflammatory markers; however, multiple studies have been unable to establish consistent clinical improvements (278, 279). The largest and most recent series to evaluate Fontan completion without cardiopulmonary bypass found no difference in immediate postoperative pressures or in early outcomes including chest tube drainage, arrhythmias, or mechanical ventilation (280). Although avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass at completion Fontan in HLHS is safe and can be done with consistent results, it appears at this juncture to have no clinical benefit to patient care and will require more study if it is to become widely adopted.…”
Section: Stage III (Fontan Operation; Total Cavopulmonary Connection)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study as well as others did not establish any difference in hemodynamics or postoperative clinical improvements when performing the procedure off CPB. [ 28 29 ] While our study specifically investigated the use of CPB and its relationship to duration of chest tube drainage and length of hospital stay, Navabi et al . additionally evaluated duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of arrhythmias, and postoperative hemodynamic instability and found no meaningful differences between those who did and did not require CPB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of off-pump TCPC include all the advantages of extracardiac TCPC, and the surgery is performed at normothermia on beating heart, and it excludes all deleterious effects of CPB. [5][6][7]22,24,25 It has been our current strategy to perform off-pump TCPC unless the patient requires any intracardiac procedure, including patients with heterotaxy syndromes. A prior Glenn anastomosis, a systemic to PA shunt, or the need for a PA plasty is not a contraindication for this operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%