2018
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001814
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding Cribari gridlock: The standardized triage assessment tool improves the accuracy of the Cribari matrix method in identifying potential overtriage and undertriage

Abstract: Prognostic, level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cribari matrix has been questioned for overestimating overtriage and undertriage. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cribari matrix has been questioned for overestimating overtriage and undertriage. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STAT method combines the TTM with NFTI. 6 However, timely classification balancing resource consumption and injury severity is still needed. NFTI and STAT have significant drawbacks as they both miss important emergent interventions and include other patients unnecessarily based on delayed outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these concerns, the need for trauma intervention (NFTI) and the secondary triage assessment tool (STAT) has recently been proposed to measure TTA appropriateness. 6,7 Both definitions suffer from limitations. STAT includes the union of NFTI and TTM and thus suffers from all the same limitations of TTM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of the authors' knowledge, the literature does not contain any studies that investigated undertriage in the geriatric population, as calculated by the Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) tool. The NFTI tool is a novel metric that performs a secondary review of trauma patients to determine the presence of major trauma [6,7]. This tool accounts for resource utilization and patient outcomes in combination with objectively measuring injuries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%