2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding epistemological silos and empirical elephants in OM: How to combine empirical and simulation methods?

Abstract: Progression of knowledge in operations management (OM) relies on researchers building and testing theories using data from practice. However, standalone empirical research designs have inherent limitations and may not adequately capture complex OM problems. This may result in researchers narrowing the scope of the problems that they create epistemological silos and study empirical elephants. In this introductory article to the special issue, we look at the ways simulation methods can augment and answer questio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, Chandrasekaran et al (2018) overview the latest possible uses for the combining empirical and simulation methods. Absent from their model is our use of experiments offering causal evidence of effects joined with simulation that quantify these effects on delivery operations systems (Chandrasekaran et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Chandrasekaran et al (2018) overview the latest possible uses for the combining empirical and simulation methods. Absent from their model is our use of experiments offering causal evidence of effects joined with simulation that quantify these effects on delivery operations systems (Chandrasekaran et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single case study faces the inherent challenge of limited generalisability. Adding simulation using the system dynamics method to the empirical case analysis allowed us to explore counterfactuals (Chandrasekaran et al, 2018). Furthermore, the simulation model makes it possible to create variety in critical decisions, boundary conditions and parameters for which cannot be observed in the empirical case data.…”
Section: Methodology: a Combined‐methods Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applaud the research development in the field of ITO. Meanwhile, we observed a strong reliance on cross‐sectional research designs in the extant literature, and studies that, due to the inherent limitation of methodology setting, often omit the fact that buyer–supplier relationships are dynamic and can change over time (Chandrasekaran, Linderman, & Sting, 2018). A static view of ITO relationships limits our understanding of how these relationships evolve into a spiral, what are the potential mechanisms to reverse this downward spiral and what are the boundary conditions of the reversal mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we design a simulation to understand the implications of our model for managerial decision‐making related to capacity setting, effort allocation, and task closure (cf. Chandrasekaran, Linderman, & Sting, ). We demonstrate that managers can adopt our recommended approach to address a larger number of tasks with a minimal lowering of the overall successful resolution rates, while improving response times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%