2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1808.07687
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding long Berge cycles, the missing cases $k=r+1$ and $k = r+2$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining case of t = k + 1 was settled by Davoodi, Győri, Methuku and Tompkins [5]. For long cycles, Füredi, Kostochka and Luo [7] showed that for k ≥ 3 and t [6]. The case when t = k is recently settled by Győri et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The remaining case of t = k + 1 was settled by Davoodi, Győri, Methuku and Tompkins [5]. For long cycles, Füredi, Kostochka and Luo [7] showed that for k ≥ 3 and t [6]. The case when t = k is recently settled by Győri et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Later they [6] also determined exact bounds and extremal constructions for all n, for the case k ≥ r+4. Kostochka and Luo [9] determine a bound for k ≤ r − 1 which is sharp for infinitely many n. Ergemlidze, Győry, Metukhu, Salia, Tompikns and Zamora [4] determine a bound in the cases where k ∈ {r + 1, r + 2}. The case when k = r remained open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case when k = r remained open. Both papers [9,4] conjectured the maximum number of edges to be bounded by max (n−1)(r−1) r , n − (r − 1) (See Figure 1). Theorem 5 (Füredi, Kostochka and Luo [5,6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bounds were improved by Füredi and Özkahya [9], Jiang and Ma [19], Gerbner, Methuku and Vizer [11]. Recently Füredi, Kostochka and Luo [7] started the study of the maximum size of an n-vertex r-uniform hypergraph without any Berge cycle of length at least k. This study has been continued in [8,18,20,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%