2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47847-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding Network Congestion with Local Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation methodology is based on the one proposed in [3]. Most important performance measures are latency since generation 2 (time required to deliver a message, including the time spent at the source queue) and throughput (maximum traffic accepted by the network).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation methodology is based on the one proposed in [3]. Most important performance measures are latency since generation 2 (time required to deliver a message, including the time spent at the source queue) and throughput (maximum traffic accepted by the network).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, each node has four injection/ejection channels. We showed the advantages of having several injection/ejection channels in [3].…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, it progressively reduces the bandwidth available to inject messages, either by reducing the number of injection channels or, if it is necessary, by applying increasing intervals of forbidden message injection. The mechanism has been exhaustively tested, achieving good results in all the evaluated conditions and improving recent proposals [2], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Message throttling [4] (stop or slow down the injection rate of messages) has been the most frequently used method. Several mechanisms for multiprocessors have already been proposed but they have important drawbacks [2]. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a new mechanism to avoid network saturation that tries to overcome these drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], it was shown that deadlocks rarely occur when sufficient routing freedom is provided, but are more likely to occur when the network is close to or beyond saturation. Moreover, the use of techniques that avoid network saturation such as the message injection limitation mechanisms proposed in [14], [4], [5] reduces the probability of deadlock to negligible levels, even when fully adaptive routing is used with only a few virtual channels. These results suggest that deadlock recovery techniques can be more effective than avoidance techniques because it is more worthwhile to use the available resources to supply unrestricted fully adaptive routing than to avoid deadlocks that seldom occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%