2017
DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.peer1-1706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding Racial Essentialism in Medical Science Curricula

Abstract: A wave of medical student activism is shining a spotlight on medical educators' sometimes maladroit handling of racial categories in teaching about health disparities. Coinciding with recent critiques, primarily by social scientists, regarding the imprecise and inappropriate use of race as a biological or epidemiological risk factor in genetics research, medical student activism has triggered new collaborations among students, faculty, and administrators to rethink how race is addressed in the medical curricul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Throughout medical training, students and trainees are exposed to multiple methods of instruction that enhance bias and misconceptions about race, genetics, culture, and disparities. 1216 In this context, teaching medical professionals about structural racism and how to recognize and address bias in clinical encounters has become increasingly imperative. 11,1720…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Throughout medical training, students and trainees are exposed to multiple methods of instruction that enhance bias and misconceptions about race, genetics, culture, and disparities. 1216 In this context, teaching medical professionals about structural racism and how to recognize and address bias in clinical encounters has become increasingly imperative. 11,1720…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students learn to associate race with disease conditions, such as sarcoidosis, cystic fibrosis, hypertension, and focal segmental glomerulonephritis, which upholds their implicit understandings of race as a biological trait. 33 , 34 Professors might misleadingly equate genetic ancestry, which could be meaningful when traced to a narrowly circumscribed population of origin (eg, Biafada people), with race (eg, African ancestry). 35 , 36 On the wards, students learn that race is relevant to treatment decisions and have inadequate power to question the racialised assumptions of their supervisors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More to the point, medical education, in general, continues to avoid confronting the contribution of physician bias to health disparities, preferring curricula of racial disparities without racism in medicine. 60–62 Medical schools have typically reduced health care inequities to the common topics of “disparity statistics, power analysis, and cultural competence training” 63 (p364) and the omission of the contribution of medical professionals to health inequities. 64 (p442) It is therefore hardly surprising that students and faculty are ready with the mantras of “everyone is treated equally” and “we treat all patients the same.” 65 (pp7–8)…”
Section: Collusive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One persistent criticism by social scientists has been the slow adoption of race as a social construct in medical education. Why has sociological theory barely seeped into changing how medical students are taught about racial disparities 60–62 ? Why the absence of social and behavioral scientists and humanists in medical school faculty and curriculum integration?…”
Section: Collusive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%