2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13753-011-0001-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding the avoidable: Towards a European heat waves risk governance

Abstract: The death toll of recent heat waves in developed countries has been remarkably high, contradicting the common assumption that high levels of economic and technological development automatically lead to lower vulnerability to weather extremes. Future climate change may further increase this vulnerability. In this article we examine some recent evidence of heat wave-related mortality and we conclude that while economic wealth and technological capacity might be a necessary condition for adequately coping with ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat waves across Europe in 2003 and 2010 indicate the vulnerability of urban populations. This is despite the high levels of development in Europe (Lass et al 2011).…”
Section: Thermal Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The heat waves across Europe in 2003 and 2010 indicate the vulnerability of urban populations. This is despite the high levels of development in Europe (Lass et al 2011).…”
Section: Thermal Stressmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consequently, debates among policy makers are focusing around the issue of how to maintain urban regions as attractive, productive and safe places in the future. These debates evolve in a direct relation with the governance of heat risks, an emerging policy field in Europe in the wake of the 2003 and 2006 heat waves which resulted in peaks in morbidity and mortality, and a sharp controversy across the continent (Boezeman, Ganzevoort, Lier & Louwers, 2014;Kovats & Hajat, 2008;Lass, Haas, Hinkel & Jaeger, 2011). The central question in these debates is whether and how urban warming should be a legitimate object for governance, and, if so, whether it should be a matter of social cohesion policy (Klinenberg, 2003;Poumadère, Mays, Le Mer & Blong, 2005), town planning (Hebbert & Mackillop, 2013), public health (Kovats & Hajat, 2008), or any other field of collective organisation.…”
Section: Heated Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Heffernan [21], adaptation as a strategy of coping with climate change, in contrast to mitigation strategies, has not remained at the center of scientific focus to date. Recently, however, the reality of climate extremes in the form of events, such as floods, droughts or heat waves [22], has forced researchers and policy-makers to explore ways of handling these extremes and adaptation to climate change has become more topical and pertinent than ever before.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%