2021
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202103287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding the Center‐Symmetry Trap: Programmed Assembly of Dipolar Precursors into Porous, Crystalline Molecular Thin Films

Abstract: Liquid‐phase, quasi‐epitaxial growth is used to stack asymmetric, dipolar organic compounds on inorganic substrates, permitting porous, crystalline molecular materials that lack inversion symmetry. This allows material fabrication with built‐in electric fields. A new programmed assembly strategy based on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is described that facilitates crystalline, noncentrosymmetric space groups for achiral compounds. Electric fields are integrated into crystalline, porous thin films with an orie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach towards directional packing of coordination networks at the solid/liquid interface on graphite surfaces has also been realized [17] . In our preliminary research, as proof‐of‐concept, the useful utility of model dipolar asymmetric‐bipyridines precursors, namely, 2,6‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyridine was demonstrated to form porous crystalline thin films using programmed layer‐by‐layer (lbl) assembly [18] . The lbl technique allowed for the quasi‐epitaxial stacking of asymmetric dipolar 4,4′‐bipyridine tectons to yield porous, crystalline molecular materials that lack inversion symmetry and contain a built‐in electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach towards directional packing of coordination networks at the solid/liquid interface on graphite surfaces has also been realized [17] . In our preliminary research, as proof‐of‐concept, the useful utility of model dipolar asymmetric‐bipyridines precursors, namely, 2,6‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyridine was demonstrated to form porous crystalline thin films using programmed layer‐by‐layer (lbl) assembly [18] . The lbl technique allowed for the quasi‐epitaxial stacking of asymmetric dipolar 4,4′‐bipyridine tectons to yield porous, crystalline molecular materials that lack inversion symmetry and contain a built‐in electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…IR (ATR, cm À 1 ) ṽ = 3048 (vw), 2978 (m), 2928 (w), 1632 (w), 1548 (w), 1519 (w), 1473 (w), 1452 (w), 1390 (vs), 1371 (vs), 1358 (vs), 1322 (vs), 1249 (s), 1213 (m), 1163 (m), 1142 (vs), 1116 (vs), 1007 (w), 983 (w), 963 (m), 891 (m), 871 (w), 849 (vs), 734 (m), 694 (w), 674 (vs), 578 (w), 562 (w), 523 (w), 449 (w), 414 (w). MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%) = 234 (10), 233 (70) [M( 11 B) + H] + , 232 (18) [M( 11 B)] + , 231 (8) [M( 10 B)] + , 218 (33), 217 (8), 181 (41), 176 (8), 148 (13), 147 (100), 134 (33), 133 (37), 132 (11), 131 (43), 129 (13), 119 (8), 100 (9), 69 (78), 59 (14), 58 (13). HRMS (EI, [M] + , C 13 H 20 O 2 N 11 B) calcd.…”
Section: Additional Information On the Chemical Synthesis Is Availabl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 50 The key challenge for the experimental realization of such systems is that one must realize an asymmetric bonding of the linkers in order to align their dipoles (see discussion in ref ( 50 ) for details). The first successful steps in this direction have recently been made for 1,4-biphenyldicarboxylate-linked Cu-paddlewheel sheets connected by polar apical linkers, 52 but in these experiments the realized degree of dipole alignment was still rather low.…”
Section: Perspectives: Distributed Dipole Sams and Polar Linkers In C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive methods for MOF construction, design, and selection of the most prominent candidates with a desired functionality will significantly accelerate the discovery of new formulations and reduce costs (Mancuso et al, 2020). There are several free and commercial tools or molecular editors for the initial construction of a representative MOF model, e.g., Avogadro (Nefedov et al, 2021) and Materials Studio (Dassault Systèmes, 2020). Often, they require timeconsuming manual work and prior knowledge of the topological details and metal-organic interactions in MOF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%