2016
DOI: 10.1177/0264550516660766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding the pathologizing of children of prisoners

Abstract: Using the existing empirical literature and making reference to original research with Canadian children of prisoners, this Practice Note offers a caution to practitioners against making homogenizing or pathologizing assumptions about children who have a parent involved in the criminal justice system. Specifically, the notions that children of prisoners are highly likely to follow their parent to prison, are identical in their experiences of parental incarceration, or are necessarily in need of a specific coun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should, however, be noted that because it is difficult to disentangle the long-term effects of parental imprisonment from those of other forms of disadvantage suffered by the children of offenders, claims of causation should be treated with caution (Flynn, 2013; Murray and Farrington, 2008). Knudsen (2016) adds the important warning that practitioners should not react to evidence of enhanced risks of future offending by making ‘homogenizing or pathologizing’ assumptions about all children with a parent in prison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should, however, be noted that because it is difficult to disentangle the long-term effects of parental imprisonment from those of other forms of disadvantage suffered by the children of offenders, claims of causation should be treated with caution (Flynn, 2013; Murray and Farrington, 2008). Knudsen (2016) adds the important warning that practitioners should not react to evidence of enhanced risks of future offending by making ‘homogenizing or pathologizing’ assumptions about all children with a parent in prison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributions are increasingly anchored on different socio-geographic contexts, thus extending the analytical focus to variable legal, penal, and social settings, as this edited collection illustrates in a particularly elucidative manner. This body of literature is, therefore, increasingly aware of the specific implications of imprisonment to different social groups-such as children of prisoners (Knudsen, 2016;Smith, 2014;Wakefield and Wildeman, 2013;Minson, this volume;Oldrup and Frederiksen, this volume), prisoners' partners (Codd, 2000;Comfort, 2008;Fishman, 1990;Girshick, 1996;Kotova, this volume), prisoners' extended family (Braman, 2004;Condry, 2007;Christian and Kennedy, 2011;Touraut, 2012), and communities highly affected by imprisonment (Clear, 2007;Cunha, 2008).…”
Section: Imprisonment and Family: (In)visibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally children with mothers in prison encounter similar problems (Dawson, Brookes, Carter, Larman & Jackson, 2013 ;Easterling & Feldman, 2017;Flynn, 2014;Knudsen, 2016;Roberts, 2012). As long ago as 1983, the children of prisoners were described as 'forgotten victims' (Matthews, 1983) and arguably this is still the case; there are no formal systems in place or consistent support offered to the children of prisoners (Ministry of Justice/DCSF 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%