2011
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

aVR vs. -aVR: should aVR be left where it is?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 involving the features from a Goldberger and from an Einthoven lead traces back to the fact that aVR, aVL and aVF can be calculated with a linear combination of the signals from lead I, II and III and are therefore dependent on each other. The negative correlation coefficients involving amplitude features from the aVR lead is due to the predominantly negative signal in this lead [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 involving the features from a Goldberger and from an Einthoven lead traces back to the fact that aVR, aVL and aVF can be calculated with a linear combination of the signals from lead I, II and III and are therefore dependent on each other. The negative correlation coefficients involving amplitude features from the aVR lead is due to the predominantly negative signal in this lead [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%