2020
DOI: 10.7202/1070606ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awaiting Education: Friedrich Nietzsche On the Future of Our Educational Institutions

Abstract: The republication of Nietzsche’s lectures “On the Future of Our Educational Institutions” invites reconsideration of Nietzsche’s thought on education. Though there is much in these lectures that might appeal to those struggling for the future of the humanities, or for the future of education more generally, I argue against their use in the attempted redemption of the humanities or education. Consideration of “Schopenhauer as Educator”, published two years later, brings out Nietzsche’s growing hostility to educ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bingham (2001;, Fennell (2005), Fitzsimons (2007, Gregory (2001), Irwin (2003), Jonas (2009Jonas ( , 2010Jonas ( , 2012Jonas ( , 2013aJonas ( , 2013b, Jonas & Nakazawa (2008), Jonas & Yacek (2018), Joosten (2015), Marshall (2001), Mintz (2004), Ramaekers (2001), Sassone (2004), Steel (2014), Stolz (2017), Tubbs (2005), Yacek (2014aYacek ( , 2014b-others have argued that Nietzsche's philosophical legacy is incompatible with the aims and practices of democratic education-e.g. Allen (2017), Aviram (1991), Jenkins (1982), Johnston (2001), Rosenow (1973Rosenow ( , 1989. As we hope the show in determining the contemporary educational "relevance" of Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy, we believe that the former group has this right.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Bingham (2001;, Fennell (2005), Fitzsimons (2007, Gregory (2001), Irwin (2003), Jonas (2009Jonas ( , 2010Jonas ( , 2012Jonas ( , 2013aJonas ( , 2013b, Jonas & Nakazawa (2008), Jonas & Yacek (2018), Joosten (2015), Marshall (2001), Mintz (2004), Ramaekers (2001), Sassone (2004), Steel (2014), Stolz (2017), Tubbs (2005), Yacek (2014aYacek ( , 2014b-others have argued that Nietzsche's philosophical legacy is incompatible with the aims and practices of democratic education-e.g. Allen (2017), Aviram (1991), Jenkins (1982), Johnston (2001), Rosenow (1973Rosenow ( , 1989. As we hope the show in determining the contemporary educational "relevance" of Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy, we believe that the former group has this right.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Yet, with respect to education, how much schooling can be found in the content of The Gay Science? Typically, studies regarding the educational side of Nietzsche's philosophy are referred-or partially referred-to in the more relevant content texts "Schopenhauer as Educator" and "On the future of our Educational Institutions" (Babich 2019;Jonas 2018;Allen 2017;Stolz 2017;Golomb 1985). Furthermore, the concept of Superhuman in his original work "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" (will also be cited as TSZ) and its potential incorporation in the educational process has been fascinating educators for a long time now (Rosenow 1973;Sassone 1996;Fitzsimons 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If nothing else, one might suggest that the considerable hostility to education (particularly modern education) displayed in Nietzsche's work makes it easier to consider its end as something we could approach with dark interest rather than plain horror. But, as I have explored elsewhere, this interpretation of Nietzschean thought and its relation to the question of education is not without controversy(Allen, 2017b). Previous scholarship agrees that Nietzsche leads us to question aspects of education, but does not take Nietzschean thought to its limit, as we wonder if modern education and its associated moral and intellectual devices, its Western ancestral traditions and biases, might be questionable as a whole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%