1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00367745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awakening from Descartes' nightmare: On the love of ambiguity in phenomenological approaches to education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…48,49 An interpretive study can be judged by how carefully the research questions were framed, how carefully data collection was accomplished and documented, and how rigorous the effort to go beyond publicly available understandings to reveal new and deeper possibilities for understanding. 50 To control for biased interpretations, an expert interpretive researcher and several doctoral students read selected interviews and responded to my emerging analysis.…”
Section: Research Tutorial #1: What Is Interpretive Phenomenology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 An interpretive study can be judged by how carefully the research questions were framed, how carefully data collection was accomplished and documented, and how rigorous the effort to go beyond publicly available understandings to reveal new and deeper possibilities for understanding. 50 To control for biased interpretations, an expert interpretive researcher and several doctoral students read selected interviews and responded to my emerging analysis.…”
Section: Research Tutorial #1: What Is Interpretive Phenomenology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For phenomenology's founder, Husserl (1973), phenomenology was a method of research that returned to the lived world, the world of experiences, which he saw as the starting point of all science (Jardine 1990). Phenomenology asks, "What is this or that kind of experience like?"…”
Section: A Phenomenological-hermeneutics Case Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former seeks to legitimize itself in the eyes of quantitative researchers, and the latter seeks to substantiate qualitative research as a valid alternative, supportive rather than competitive, motivated to achieve additional, and valuable, research outcomes. Researchers have, over the years, identified the challenges of such broad epistemological variations (Angen, 2000;Jardine, 1990;Sandelowski, 1993), and, while qualitative research has grown in application and use (Cooper & White, 2012;Cummings, Daellenbach, Davenport, & Campbell, 2013;Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007;Locke, 2011;Morse et al, 2009), debates concerning the methodological paradigms between approaches, and questions about the broader practical use of qualitative research continue (Bansal, Bertels, Ewart, MacConnachie, & O'Brien, 2012;Denyer & Tranfield, 2009).…”
Section: Qualitative Methodology and The Grounded Theory Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%