2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awareness modulates responses of the amygdala and the visual cortex to highly arousing visual threat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not find any difference between these conditions. This result is consistent with the idea that the structures that give rise to the emotional modulation of the pupil may be automatic and beyond conscious control, a claim that has been made for some brain structures that may mediate the emotional modulation of pupil responses (e.g., Whalen et al, ), though this is disputed by others (Hoffmann et al, ). We stress, however, that we did not attempt a very stringent test of whether attention could ever modulate the effect of emotion on the pupil's response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not find any difference between these conditions. This result is consistent with the idea that the structures that give rise to the emotional modulation of the pupil may be automatic and beyond conscious control, a claim that has been made for some brain structures that may mediate the emotional modulation of pupil responses (e.g., Whalen et al, ), though this is disputed by others (Hoffmann et al, ). We stress, however, that we did not attempt a very stringent test of whether attention could ever modulate the effect of emotion on the pupil's response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Future experiments might seek to limit the duration of processing by introducing a “backward masking” procedure (where the target stimulus is immediately followed by a pattern mask that stops further visual processing of the target). It would also be of great interest to extend this experiment to even briefer intervals where the detection of the emotional content of the stimulus no longer produces a conscious or reportable sensation (so‐called subliminal presentations: see Nuske et al, ) given the claims that areas such as the amygdala not only can respond to subliminal stimuli, but may even give greater responses than to supraliminal stimuli (Williams et al, )—though also see Hoffmann, Lipka, Mothes‐Lasch, Miltner, and Straube (). We should also note that we only analyzed the pupil response for a limited window of time shortly after stimulus onset (1,000–2,000 ms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although caregiving responses may be weaker when the child is not in distress (i.e., crying) or when the threat is aimed at the adult, the hypothesis that neural differences can be observed if the subliminal threat is really processed may still be warranted. Interestingly, results of some recent studies actually do not provide much support for the existence of a human brain system capable of preconscious processing of threatening information (see Pessoa and Adolphs, 2010 ; Hoffmann et al, 2012 ). It should be noted that in earlier studies of “subliminal” processing of affective information primes were often presented for 30 ms or longer (Morris et al, 1998 ; Whalen et al, 1998 ; Dimberg et al, 2000 ; Li et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in some studies no evidence for the existence of such an automatic processing system of threat-related stimuli was found. For example, in earlier studies with threat-related stimuli presented in supraliminal and subliminal conditions, enhanced amygdala activity was found in the supraliminal, but not in the subliminal condition (Pessoa et al, 2006 ; Hoffmann et al, 2012 ). Importantly, not everyone may respond to emotional or threatening information in the same way, and such moderating effects may explain inconsistent findings for main effects of threat-related stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The existing literature on prediction and consciousness suggests that prior expectations decrease the overall neural amplitude (Summerfield et al, 2011) but increase the precision of a stimulus' neural representation in V1 (Kok et al, 2012;Kok et al, 2013), possibly facilitated by the pulvinar (Kanai et al, 2015) or other feedback sources to V1's deep cortical layers (Kok et al, 2016). Conscious access to emotional stimuli, on the other hand, appears to be modulated by the amplitude of neural signal in the amygdala and its connected cortical visual areas (Anderson and Phelps, 2001;Hoffmann et al, 2012). During conscious emotion perception, functional connectivity is increased between the amygdala and the extrastriate cortex, compared to between the brainstem, pulvinar, and amygdala during unconscious perception (Williams et al, 2006).…”
Section: Affective and Predictive Influences On Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%